Carlson J E, Zocchi K A, Bettencourt D M, Gambrel M L, Freeman J L, Zhang D, Goodwin J S
Department of Internal Medicine and the Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0460, USA.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 May-Jun;77(3):252-7. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199805000-00012.
Functional homeostasis is the ability of an individual to withstand illness without loss of function. We investigate whether the level of functional homeostasis predicts adverse outcomes in the 6 months posthospital discharge in older men and women. A prospective cohort study was conducted in an acute care geriatric inpatient unit of a university hospital. Subjects included a consecutive series of patients admitted to the unit. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument was used to assess patients at four time points: preillness, hospital admission, hospital discharge, and 6 months postdischarge. Of the 122 subjects available for analysis, 64 (52%) experienced a decline in functional level from preillness to hospital discharge and were defined as having poor functional homeostasis, whereas 58 (48%) experienced no change or an increase in functional status and were defined as having good functional homeostasis. Those with poor functional homeostasis had a higher 6-month readmission rate to the hospital (59.4 v 39.7%; P=0.03) and a higher rate of any adverse outcome (78.1 v 50%; P=0.001) than those with good functional homeostasis. In logistic regressive analyses, functional homeostasis remained a significant and powerful predictor of adverse outcomes independent of actual level of function at discharge, age, gender, living status, and other factors that might influence outcomes. Change in functional status associated with an acute illness is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes and, in this study, a better predictor than actual level of function at discharge. Functional homeostasis is one approach to the quantification of the important but elusive concept of frailty in the elderly.
功能稳态是个体抵御疾病而不丧失功能的能力。我们研究功能稳态水平是否能预测老年男性和女性出院后6个月内的不良结局。在一家大学医院的急性老年病住院单元进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。研究对象包括该单元连续收治的一系列患者。采用功能独立性测量(FIM)工具在四个时间点对患者进行评估:病前、入院、出院以及出院后6个月。在122名可供分析的研究对象中,64名(52%)从病前到出院功能水平下降,被定义为功能稳态差,而58名(48%)功能状态无变化或有所改善,被定义为功能稳态良好。与功能稳态良好的患者相比,功能稳态差的患者6个月内再次入院率更高(59.4%对39.7%;P=0.03),任何不良结局的发生率也更高(78.1%对50%;P=0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,功能稳态仍然是不良结局的一个显著且有力的预测因素,独立于出院时的实际功能水平、年龄、性别、生活状况以及其他可能影响结局的因素。与急性疾病相关的功能状态变化是不良结局的一个独立预测因素,在本研究中,它比出院时的实际功能水平是更好的预测因素。功能稳态是量化老年人中重要但难以捉摸的衰弱概念的一种方法。