Li X, Howard D, Stanton B, Rachuba L, Cross S
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Center for Minority Health Research, University of Maryland at Baltimore, 21201, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Jun;152(6):569-77. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.6.569.
To explore the factor structure of the Checklist of Children's Distress Symptoms (CCDS); to examine whether there is a higher-order single construct underlying the CCDS measure; and, to assess the association between children's distress symptoms, as reflected by the CCDS factors, and children's self-reported exposure to community violence (both victimization and witness events).
Community-based cross-sectional survey.
Ten public housing developments in an eastern metropolis.
A total of 349 low-income urban African American children and adolescents (198 males; 151 females), 9 through 15 years of age.
Children's distress symptoms, exposure to community violence, and selected demographic information including parental education, parental employment status, perceived health status, and school performance.
Exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine the factorial structure of the CCDS measure. Second-order confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine if there is a higher-order single underlying construct among CCDS factors. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed to assess the relationship between exposure to violence and CCDS factors.
The exploratory factor analysis yielded a 6-factor solution for the CCDS measure with satisfactory internal consistency. The confirmatory factor model with a single second-order construct yielded a good fit to the data. In general, youth who experienced violent victimization or witnessed violent events reported higher levels of distress symptoms than those who did not. Distress symptoms labeled as "intrusive thoughts," "distraction," and "lack of belongingness" were most frequently associated with exposure to violence. Distress symptoms did not differ on the basis of sex or age.
The CCDS has utility as a measure of distress symptoms among urban African American children and adolescents. Whereas analysis provided support for a single higher-order construct, using the proposed 6-factor structure should enhance our understanding of the psychological impact of exposure to violence on youth and contribute to more effective intervention efforts.
探讨儿童苦恼症状清单(CCDS)的因素结构;检验CCDS测量指标是否存在一个高阶单一结构;评估CCDS各因素所反映的儿童苦恼症状与儿童自我报告的社区暴力暴露情况(包括受害和目睹事件)之间的关联。
基于社区的横断面调查。
东部一个大都市的10个公共住房开发区。
共349名9至15岁的低收入城市非裔美国儿童和青少年(198名男性;151名女性)。
儿童苦恼症状、社区暴力暴露情况以及选定的人口统计学信息,包括父母教育程度、父母就业状况、自我感知健康状况和学业成绩。
进行探索性因素分析以确定CCDS测量指标的因素结构。进行二阶验证性因素分析以确定CCDS各因素之间是否存在一个高阶单一潜在结构。计算皮尔逊相关系数以评估暴力暴露与CCDS各因素之间的关系。
探索性因素分析得出CCDS测量指标的一个6因素解决方案,内部一致性令人满意。具有单一二阶结构的验证性因素模型与数据拟合良好。总体而言,经历暴力受害或目睹暴力事件的青少年报告的苦恼症状水平高于未经历者。标记为“侵入性思维”“注意力分散”和“归属感缺失”的苦恼症状与暴力暴露最为相关。苦恼症状在性别或年龄方面没有差异。
CCDS可作为衡量城市非裔美国儿童和青少年苦恼症状的工具。虽然分析支持一个单一的高阶结构,但采用提议的6因素结构应能增强我们对暴力暴露对青少年心理影响的理解,并有助于开展更有效的干预工作。