Klopfenstein C E, Van Gessel E, Forster A
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 May;15(3):314-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1998.00295.x.
Checking the anaesthetic machine before its daily use is essential. The aim of our study was to evaluate, through the use of an anonymous questionnaire, how the anaesthetists of our institution (physicians and nurses) report their daily checking. Sixty-three questions were used to ask the participants how frequently they checked the main components of the anaesthetic machine; the answers were evaluated with a score (0-3). The overall response rate was 78%, nurses; rate being lower than physicians' rate. Nurses obtained a higher global score, which raises the question of different adherence to guidelines by nurses and physicians. Moreover, questions in relation to gas supply were badly scored by all participants, which should alert us to reinforce theoretical and practical training in these items. Finally, although the methodology used in this survey could raise the question of the best way to evaluate the actual checkout procedure, self-reported assessment remains an alternative to more complex and expensive methods, such as an observer or a video evaluation.
在每天使用麻醉机之前进行检查至关重要。我们研究的目的是通过使用一份匿名问卷,评估我们机构的麻醉医生(医生和护士)如何报告他们的日常检查情况。用63个问题询问参与者检查麻醉机主要部件的频率;答案以分数(0 - 3)进行评估。总体回复率为78%,护士的回复率低于医生的回复率。护士获得了更高的总分,这就引发了护士和医生对指南遵循情况不同的问题。此外,所有参与者关于气体供应的问题得分都很低,这应该提醒我们加强这些项目的理论和实践培训。最后,尽管本次调查所采用的方法可能会引发关于评估实际检查程序最佳方式的问题,但自我报告评估仍是一种替代更复杂且昂贵方法(如观察者评估或视频评估)的方式。