• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?在国家宫颈癌筛查计划中实现目标:当前的做法是否不道德?
J Med Ethics. 1998 Jun;24(3):151-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.3.151.
2
[Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].[波兰女性的社会状况及其参与宫颈癌人群筛查项目的情况]
Ginekol Pol. 2009 Nov;80(11):833-8.
3
Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.知情同意?基层医疗专业人员如何让女性为宫颈涂片检查做好准备:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.017. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
4
To nudge or not to nudge: cancer screening programmes and the limits of libertarian paternalism.推动还是不推动:癌症筛查计划和自由意志家长主义的局限。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1193-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201194. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
5
Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?关于筛查的信息——是为了实现高参与率还是确保知情选择?
Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):92-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00138.x.
6
Why Britain can't afford informed consent.为何英国承担不起知情同意的代价。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Aug;15(4):19-25.
7
Breast and cervical screening for women in the United Kingdom.英国女性的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查。
Hong Kong Med J. 2000 Dec;6(4):409-11.
8
Consent.同意。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 14;291(6510):1700-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6510.1700.
9
A qualitative study to assess the potential of the human papillomavirus vaccination programme to encourage under-screened mothers to attend for cervical screening.一项定性研究,旨在评估人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种计划促使筛查不足的母亲接受子宫颈筛查的可能性。
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Apr;42(2):119-26. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101283. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
10
The physician as fortune teller: a commentary on "The ethical justification for minimal paternalism.作为算命先生的医生:对《最低限度家长主义的伦理正当性》的评论
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Winter;2(4):228-38.

引用本文的文献

1
A score to estimate the likelihood of detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy.一种用于评估结肠镜检查中发现晚期结直肠肿瘤可能性的评分。
Gut. 2014 Jul;63(7):1112-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304965. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
2
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
3
Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.筛查接受情况的社会模式以及促进知情选择的影响:心理学和伦理学分析
Health Care Anal. 2008 Mar;16(1):17-30. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0056-6. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
4
Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women.
Health Expect. 2005 Dec;8(4):295-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00345.x.
5
Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening.基于证据的信息对女性参与宫颈癌筛查意愿影响的随机对照试验
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Aug;57(8):589-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.8.589.
6
Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented.癌症预防筛查的结果:宫颈异常累积发病率分析以及预防病例和死亡的建模
BMJ. 2003 Apr 26;326(7395):901. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7395.901.
7
Helping doctors with disabilities succeed in medicine.帮助残疾医生在医学领域取得成功。
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Nov;52(484):958.
8
An oral history of general practice 6: Beyond the practice: the changing relationship with secondary care.全科医疗口述史6:超越诊所:与二级医疗关系的变化
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Nov;52(484):956-7.
9
Care or control in the community?社区护理还是社区管控?
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Nov;52(484):953.
10
Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma.关于乳腺钼靶筛查效果的误解:一个公共卫生困境。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Nov;55(11):799-803. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.11.799.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequalities in health: what health systems can and cannot do.健康不平等:卫生系统能做什么及不能做什么。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jul;1(3):179-82. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100313.
2
Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for?宫颈涂片异常的检出率:我们在筛查什么?
Lancet. 1995 Jun 10;345(8963):1469-73. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91036-0.
3
Cervical cancer in nuns and prostitutes: a plea for scientific continence.修女与妓女中的宫颈癌:对科学克制的呼吁。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(6):577-82. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90062-5.
4
Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: a failure of health education and medical organization.女性对宫颈癌筛查的认知与体验:健康教育与医疗组织的失败
Community Med. 1989 Nov;11(4):279-89.
5
Cervical smears: a questionable practice?宫颈涂片检查:一种有问题的做法?
Lancet. 1989 Jul 22;2(8656):207-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90384-x.
6
Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?为什么预防医学不受伦理约束?
J Med Ethics. 1990 Dec;16(4):187-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.4.187.

在国家宫颈癌筛查计划中实现目标:当前的做法是否不道德?

Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?

作者信息

Foster P, Anderson C M

机构信息

Manchester University.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1998 Jun;24(3):151-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.3.151.

DOI:10.1136/jme.24.3.151
PMID:9650108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1377516/
Abstract

The principle of informed consent is now well established within the National Health Service (NHS) in relation to any type of medical treatment. However, this ethical principle appears to be far less well established in relation to medical screening programmes such as Britain's national cervical screening programme. This article will critically examine the case for health care providers vigorously pursuing women to accept an invitation to be screened. It will discuss the type of information which women would need in order to make an informed decision about whether or not to be screened. The lack of such information in current patient leaflets on the "smear test" will then be documented. Finally, the article will explore possible ways of maximising women's autonomy in relation to the cervical screening programme without sacrificing any of its main benefits.

摘要

在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中,关于任何类型的医疗治疗,知情同意原则现已确立。然而,在诸如英国国家子宫颈筛查计划这样的医疗筛查项目中,这一伦理原则似乎远未得到确立。本文将批判性地审视医疗保健提供者大力劝说女性接受筛查邀请的情况。它将讨论女性为了就是否接受筛查做出明智决定而需要的信息类型。随后将记录当前关于“涂片检查”的患者宣传册中缺乏此类信息的情况。最后,本文将探讨在不牺牲子宫颈筛查计划主要益处的前提下,最大化女性在该计划中的自主权的可能方法。