Descamps D, Calvez V, Collin G, Cécille A, Apetrei C, Damond F, Katlama C, Matheron S, Huraux J M, Brun-Vézinet F
Laboratoire de Virologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jul;36(7):2143-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2143-2145.1998.
We compared the line probe assay (LiPA) to sequence analysis for the detection of mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT). Plasma samples from 40 patients who had received zidovudine, dideoxyinosine, and dideoxycytosine, alone or in combination, and who were enrolled in the ALTIS 2 clinical trial (lamivudine [3TC] plus stavudine) were tested at enrollment and at week 24. RT PCR products from plasma were used for LiPA, and DNA was used for sequence analysis. LiPA gave uninterpretable results for 8.5% of the analyzed codons corresponding to 63 samples, mainly for codons 41, 69, and 70. Several minor discrepancies between the two methods occurred, mainly due to the ability of LiPA to detect mixed populations while sequence analyses detect a single homogeneous population. LiPA is suitable for detecting mixed populations and easy to implement in clinical laboratories and might be useful for epidemiological surveys of primary HIV-1 resistance.
我们将线性探针分析(LiPA)与序列分析进行了比较,以检测赋予对人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)逆转录酶(RT)核苷类抑制剂耐药性的突变。对40例接受过齐多夫定、双脱氧肌苷和双脱氧胞苷单用或联合用药且参加了ALTIS 2临床试验(拉米夫定[3TC]加司他夫定)的患者的血浆样本在入组时和第24周进行检测。血浆中的RT PCR产物用于LiPA,DNA用于序列分析。LiPA对63个样本对应的8.5%的分析密码子给出了无法解读的结果,主要是密码子41、69和70。两种方法之间出现了一些小差异,主要是因为LiPA能够检测混合群体,而序列分析检测的是单一均匀群体。LiPA适用于检测混合群体,易于在临床实验室实施,可能有助于原发性HIV-1耐药性的流行病学调查。