• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30问卷评估:与意大利长期存活癌症患者队列中的SF-36健康调查的比较

Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients.

作者信息

Apolone G, Filiberti A, Cifani S, Ruggiata R, Mosconi P

机构信息

Laboratorio per la Ricerca Clinica Oncologica, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 1998 May;9(5):549-57. doi: 10.1023/a:1008264412398.

DOI:10.1023/a:1008264412398
PMID:9653497
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the large amount of data available about the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, there have been very few studies focussed on long-survival cancer patients, and no data are available on its performance in the Italian setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the framework of a project aimed at evaluating the characteristics of available HR-QOL questionnaires in the Italian language, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire together with the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) were mail-administered to a sample of patients previously recruited in two large multicenter randomized clinical trials on early breast and colon cancers. The properties of the questionnaire were evaluated using standard psychometric techniques and correlation analyses with demographic and clinical independent variables.

RESULTS

In the sample of patients who sent back the questionnaires under evaluation, the EORTC QLQ-C30 showed satisfactory acceptability (response rate = 64% and very low prevalence of missing at item and scale level), and the psychometric analyses confirmed the multi-dimensional conceptualisation in terms of convergent and discriminant validity. Moreover, EORTC QLQ-C30 scales showed substantial correlation with the homologous SF-36 scales. Few socio-demographic (age, gender, schooling) and clinical (type of cancer disease) variables were associated with HR-QOL. Breast cancer patients reported, on average, worse physical health-related scores, but after adjustment for age and education, most of the differences disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the validity and robustness of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in this sample of long-survival Italian cancer patients. Further ad hoc validation studies are required to evaluate its significance in these particular patients.

摘要

背景

尽管有大量关于欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)的数据,但针对长期存活癌症患者的研究极少,且尚无其在意大利环境下表现的数据。

患者与方法

在一个旨在评估意大利语可用健康相关生活质量问卷特征的项目框架内,将EORTC QLQ-C30问卷与简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)邮寄给先前在两项关于早期乳腺癌和结肠癌的大型多中心随机临床试验中招募的患者样本。使用标准心理测量技术以及与人口统计学和临床独立变量的相关分析来评估问卷的属性。

结果

在回复所评估问卷的患者样本中,EORTC QLQ-C30显示出令人满意的可接受性(回复率 = 64%,项目和量表层面的缺失率极低),并且心理测量分析从收敛效度和区分效度方面证实了其多维概念化。此外,EORTC QLQ-C30量表与同源的SF-36量表显示出显著相关性。很少有社会人口统计学(年龄、性别、受教育程度)和临床(癌症疾病类型)变量与健康相关生活质量相关。乳腺癌患者平均报告的与身体健康相关的得分较差,但在对年龄和教育程度进行调整后,大多数差异消失。

结论

这些发现证实了EORTC QLQ-C30在这个长期存活的意大利癌症患者样本中的有效性和稳健性。需要进一步的专项验证研究来评估其在这些特定患者中的意义。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30问卷评估:与意大利长期存活癌症患者队列中的SF-36健康调查的比较
Ann Oncol. 1998 May;9(5):549-57. doi: 10.1023/a:1008264412398.
2
Quality of life in breast and colon cancer long-term survivors: an assessment with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36 questionnaires.乳腺癌和结肠癌长期幸存者的生活质量:使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和36项简短健康调查(SF-36)问卷进行的评估
Tumori. 2002 Mar-Apr;88(2):110-6. doi: 10.1177/030089160208800206.
3
Reliability and validity of the Amharic version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of cervical Cancer module for the assessment of health related quality of life in women with cervical cancer in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织宫颈癌模块评估宫颈癌女性健康相关生活质量的阿姆哈拉语版的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1089-x.
4
Validity of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 for measuring health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients.希腊 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-BR23 量表用于测量乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的有效性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 May;20(3):354-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01170.x.
5
Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with breast cancer - Validation of the Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-BR 53.评估乳腺癌患者生活质量的问卷——欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-BR 53中文版的验证
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
6
Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)电子患者报告结局(e-PRO)工具用于测量乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的可靠性:前瞻性随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 14;19(9):e322. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8210.
7
Psychometric properties and measurement equivalence of the Multidimensional Fatigue Syndrome Inventory- Short Form (MFSI-SF) amongst breast cancer and lymphoma patients in Singapore.新加坡乳腺癌和淋巴瘤患者多维疲劳综合征量表-简表(MFSI-SF)的心理测量特性和测量等效性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 19;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0846-6.
8
Reliability and validity of Amharic version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 modules for assessing health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia.评估埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-BR23 模块的阿姆哈拉语版本的可靠性和有效性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 12;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1257-z.
9
Psychometric validation of the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in colorectal Cancer patients: cross-sectional study and systematic literature review.《EORTC QLQ-C30 量表在摩洛哥结直肠癌患者中的信度和效度验证:横断面研究和系统文献回顾》。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07793-w.
10
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and acceptability of a self-management intervention supporting return to work for women with breast cancer.一项支持乳腺癌女性重返工作岗位的自我管理干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 20;88(7):429-443. doi: 10.1177/03080226251319900. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Real-World Quality-of-Life Data in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors Using Four Assessment Tools.使用四种评估工具对接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的真实世界生活质量数据
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;17(5):818. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050818.
3
Near-Death Quality of Life in Cancer Patients on Home Parenteral Nutrition.
接受家庭肠外营养的癌症患者濒死期的生活质量
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 13;17(2):271. doi: 10.3390/nu17020271.
4
Brain tumor-related epilepsy: an overview on neuropsychological, behavioral, and quality of life issues and assessment methodology.脑肿瘤相关性癫痫:神经心理学、行为及生活质量问题与评估方法概述
Front Neurol. 2024 Dec 11;15:1480900. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1480900. eCollection 2024.
5
Impact of a comprehensive rehabilitation palliative care program on the quality of life of patients with terminal cancer and their informal caregivers: a quasi-experimental study.综合康复姑息治疗方案对晚期癌症患者及其非正式照护者生活质量的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 May 29;23(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02028-2.
6
High Protein Oral Nutritional Supplements Enable the Majority of Cancer Patients to Meet Protein Intake Recommendations during Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment: A Randomised Controlled Parallel-Group Study.高蛋白口服营养补充剂使大多数癌症患者在全身抗癌治疗期间能够满足蛋白质摄入推荐量:一项随机对照平行组研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 7;15(24):5030. doi: 10.3390/nu15245030.
7
Predicting global QoL after orthotopic neobladder or ileal conduit diversion: nomogram development.预测原位新膀胱或回肠代膀胱术后的总体生活质量:列线图的构建
Front Oncol. 2023 May 10;13:1055140. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1055140. eCollection 2023.
8
Perception of disease, dyadic coping, and the quality of life of oncology patients in the active treatment phase and their life partners: an approach based on the actor-partner interdependence model.积极治疗阶段肿瘤患者及其生活伴侣对疾病的认知、二元应对方式与生活质量:基于行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型的研究方法
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1069767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069767. eCollection 2023.
9
Psychological Well-Being of Cancer Patients before and during the Pandemic: The Impact of COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress.癌症患者在大流行前后的心理健康:COVID-19 创伤后压力的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054106.
10
The Experience of COVID-19 in a Sample of Gynecological Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Focus on the Psychological Implications.妇科癌症化疗患者群体的 COVID-19 体验:聚焦心理影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053851.