Thorne S, Canam C, Dahinten S, Hall W, Henderson A, Kirkham S R
Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Jun;27(6):1257-68. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00623.x.
Theoretical advances in nursing have been complicated by polarization and extreme positions regarding nursing's approach to its main metaparadigm concepts: person, health, environment and nursing. In this paper, the authors deconstruct some of the central arguments that are used to further this polarization. Using a critical interpretive approach, they explain some of the logical implications imposed by various extreme positions for the larger project of nursing's health and social mandate, and consider the effects of such polarization. On the basis of an appreciation of the serious difficulties inherent in certain philosophical and theoretical positions currently evident within nursing's literature, the authors argue for a less extreme and more integrated reference point for nursing's theory and practice.
护理领域的理论进展因在护理对待其主要元范式概念(人、健康、环境和护理)的方法上存在两极分化和极端立场而变得复杂。在本文中,作者解构了一些用于加剧这种两极分化的核心论点。他们采用批判性解释方法,阐释了各种极端立场给护理的健康与社会使命这一更大项目带来的一些逻辑影响,并考量了这种两极分化的影响。基于认识到护理文献中目前明显存在的某些哲学和理论立场所固有的严重困难,作者主张为护理的理论与实践寻找一个不那么极端且更具综合性的参照点。