Törnros J
Swedish Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping, Sweden.
Accid Anal Prev. 1998 Jul;30(4):497-503. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00099-7.
The aim was to validate driving behaviour in a simulated road tunnel. Speed and lateral position of 20 subjects were measured in a real tunnel and in the same tunnel implemented in the VTI driving simulator. In both situations a left-hand steered and manually geared passenger car was used. Driving speed was higher in the simulated tunnel than in the real tunnel. Elimination of speed information from the speedometer caused a similar small speed increase in both situations. Also, the difference in speed between driving lanes was similar in both cases. The effects on speed variation were similar to that for speed level. Regarding lateral position, subjects positioned the car somewhat further away from the nearest tunnel wall in the real tunnel than in the simulated tunnel. In both situations the distance to the nearest wall was greater when it was located to the left of the driver than on the opposite side. Lateral position deviation was about the same when the road was straight, but in a curved section it was somewhat greater for the simulated tunnel. It is concluded that behavioural validity in absolute terms was not quite satisfactory, especially regarding choice of speed, whereas relative validity was good for both speed and lateral position.
目的是在模拟公路隧道中验证驾驶行为。在一条真实隧道以及VTI驾驶模拟器中构建的同一隧道内,测量了20名受试者的速度和横向位置。在两种情况下均使用了一辆左手驾驶且手动换挡的乘用车。模拟隧道中的驾驶速度高于真实隧道中的驾驶速度。从速度表中消除速度信息在两种情况下均导致了类似的小幅速度增加。此外,两种情况下行车道之间的速度差异相似。对速度变化的影响与对速度水平的影响相似。关于横向位置,受试者在真实隧道中比在模拟隧道中将车停得离最近的隧道壁稍远一些。在两种情况下,当最近的墙壁位于驾驶员左侧时,与位于相反一侧相比,到墙壁的距离更大。当道路笔直时,横向位置偏差大致相同,但在弯道部分,模拟隧道中的偏差略大。结论是,绝对而言行为有效性并不十分令人满意,尤其是在速度选择方面,而相对有效性在速度和横向位置方面都很好。