Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑可通过持续输注局部麻醉药来改善术后硬膜外镇痛。

Midazolam improves postoperative epidural analgesia with continuous infusion of local anaesthetics.

作者信息

Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tokyo.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):551-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03012706.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Midazolam has been shown to have an analgesic effect by single shot epidural administration. In this study, the effect of midazolam on continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine was investigated to find a better combination for postoperative analgesia.

METHODS

Sixty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were divided into three groups of 20. The following mixtures, in 40 ml, were infused continuously over 12 hr after surgery; 40 ml bupivacaine 0.5% in Group C, bupivacaine 0.5% 38 ml + 10 mg midazolam in Group M10, and bupivacaine 0.5% 36 ml + 20 mg midazolam in Group M20. If necessary, 50 mg indomethacin suppository was administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, analgesia score, and sedation score were monitored for 12 hr after surgery. Amnesia and frequency of the administration of indomethacin suppository were also noted.

RESULTS

Blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate showed no differences among the groups. Greater sedation was seen in Groups M10 and M20 compared with Group C during first 120 min (P < 0.05). The number of patients with memory was larger in Group C (18) than in Group M10 (10, P = 0.006) and Group M20 (6, P < 0.001). Better analgesia was obtained in patients receiving midazolam than in Group C (P < 0.05). The frequency of the indomethacin administration was 2.0 +/- 1.1 (SD) in Group C, which was larger than in Group M10 (1.1 +/- 0.9, P = 0.035) and Group M20 (1.2 +/- 0.7, P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Adding midazolam to a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine provides better analgesia, amnesia and sedation than bupivacaine alone without side effects in patients undergoing laparotomy.

摘要

目的

已证实单次硬膜外注射咪达唑仑具有镇痛作用。本研究旨在探讨咪达唑仑对布比卡因持续硬膜外输注的影响,以寻找术后镇痛的更佳组合。

方法

60例计划行胃切除术的患者被分为三组,每组20例。术后12小时持续输注以下40ml混合液;C组为0.5%布比卡因40ml,M10组为0.5%布比卡因38ml + 咪达唑仑10mg,M20组为0.5%布比卡因36ml + 咪达唑仑20mg。必要时,给予50mg吲哚美辛栓剂。术后12小时监测血压、心率、呼吸频率、镇痛评分和镇静评分。记录遗忘情况及吲哚美辛栓剂的给药频率。

结果

各组间血压、心率和呼吸频率无差异。在最初120分钟内,M10组和M20组的镇静程度高于C组(P < 0.05)。C组有记忆的患者数量(18例)多于M10组(10例,P = 0.006)和M20组(6例,P < 0.001)。接受咪达唑仑的患者镇痛效果优于C组(P < 0.05)。C组吲哚美辛的给药频率为2.0 +/- 1.1(标准差),高于M10组(1.1 +/- 0.9,P = 0.035)和M20组(1.2 +/- 0.7,P = 0.039)。

结论

在布比卡因持续硬膜外输注中添加咪达唑仑,对于接受剖腹手术的患者,与单独使用布比卡因相比,可提供更好的镇痛、遗忘和镇静效果,且无副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验