Suh D D, Schwartz I P, Canning D A, Snyder H M, Zderic S A, Kirsch A J
Division of Pediatric Urology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22(5):268-74. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1998)22:5<268::aid-lsm2>3.0.co;2-n.
Prior studies of laser tissue soldering (LTS) of epithelial skin have shown poor wound strength in the short-term; however, we hypothesize that greater tensile strength and healing properties will result from directing laser energy to the dermal aspect of the skin. The current study compares wound strength and histology in a rat skin flap model of epithelial and dermally applied LTS.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Skin flaps (2.5 x 4 cm) were raised and bisected on the dorsum of Sprague-Dawley rats. The center line of bisection was closed from a dermal approach by LTS (LTS-D, diode laser 15.9 W/cm2 + Columbia solder), the upper incision by epithelial LTS (LTS-E), and the lower incision by suturing (7-0 Vicryl). Wound skin strips (1-2 mm x 10 mm) were studied immediately (N = 14) and at 3 (N = 57), 7 (N = 31), and 10 (N = 28) days postoperatively and were subjected to tensiometric analysis. Histologic staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Mallory's trichrome methods were used to define wound architecture.
No wound dehiscences were noted in any group. Greater immediate tensile strength was noted in wounds closed by LTS-D (521 +/- 61 g/cm2) versus LTS-E (342 +/- 65 g/cm2); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .08). By 3 days, both LTS-D (476 +/- 55 g/cm2) and LTS-E (205 +/- 37 g/cm2) maintained their initial strength; however, LTS-D and sutured (436 +/- 49 g/cm2) wounds were stronger (P < .05) than LTS-E. At 7 and 10 days, LTS-D (2,433 +/- 346 g/cm2 and 3,100 +/- 390 g/cm2) showed superior tensile strength (P < .05) compared to both LTS-E (1,542 +/- 128 g/cm2 and 2,081 +/- 219 g/cm2) and suturing (1,342 +/- 119 g/cm2 and 1,661 +/- 115 g/cm2). Histologic analysis of LTS-D wounds at 3 days showed full-thickness tissue apposition, complete epithelialization, and minimal inflammation or thermal injury. At 7 days, solder was present in the wounds. In contrast, LTS-E wounds at 3 days displayed lack of epithelialization secondary to thermal injury and partial-thickness tissue apposition. However by 7 days, epithelialization was complete with moderate scarring, and no solder was seen. Sutured samples appeared similar to LTS-D, except for poorer tissue apposition at the hypodermis.
Our results show that skin flap wound healing after dermal LTS is superior to epithelial LTS and emphasizes the importance of site specificity in the utilization of this operative technique in reconstructive surgery.
先前关于上皮皮肤激光组织焊接(LTS)的研究显示短期内伤口强度较差;然而,我们推测将激光能量导向皮肤的真皮层会产生更大的抗张强度和愈合特性。本研究在大鼠皮瓣模型中比较了上皮和真皮应用LTS后的伤口强度和组织学情况。
研究设计/材料与方法:在Sprague-Dawley大鼠背部掀起皮瓣(2.5×4厘米)并将其对半切开。通过LTS从真皮途径闭合二分线的中心线(LTS-D,二极管激光15.9瓦/平方厘米+哥伦比亚焊料),上皮LTS闭合上切口(LTS-E),下切口通过缝合(7-0薇乔缝线)。术后立即(N = 14)以及术后3天(N = 57)、7天(N = 31)和10天(N = 28)对伤口皮肤条(1-2毫米×10毫米)进行研究,并进行张力分析。使用苏木精和伊红以及马洛里三色染色法进行组织学染色以确定伤口结构。
所有组均未出现伤口裂开。与LTS-E(342±65克/平方厘米)相比,LTS-D闭合的伤口立即抗张强度更大(521±61克/平方厘米);然而,这种差异无统计学意义(P = 0.08)。到3天时,LTS-D(476±55克/平方厘米)和LTS-E(205±37克/平方厘米)均保持其初始强度;然而,LTS-D和缝合(436±49克/平方厘米)的伤口比LTS-E更强(P < 0.05)。在7天和10天时,与LTS-E(1542±128克/平方厘米和2081±219克/平方厘米)和缝合(1342±119克/平方厘米和1661±115克/平方厘米)相比,LTS-D(2433±346克/平方厘米和3100±390克/平方厘米)显示出更高的抗张强度(P < 0.05)。LTS-D伤口在3天时的组织学分析显示全层组织对合、完全上皮化以及最小程度的炎症或热损伤。在7天时,伤口中有焊料存在。相比之下,LTS-E伤口在3天时因热损伤而缺乏上皮化且为部分厚度组织对合。然而到7天时,上皮化完成且有中度瘢痕形成,未见焊料。缝合样本与LTS-D相似,只是皮下组织对合较差。
我们的结果表明真皮LTS后皮瓣伤口愈合优于上皮LTS,并强调了在重建手术中应用该手术技术时部位特异性的重要性。