Shulman A, Hauser R, Lipitz S, Frenkel Y, Dor J, Bider D, Mashiach S, Yogev L, Yavetz H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998 Jul;15(6):381-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1022585000740.
Our purpose was to assess whether one or more sperm parameters have predictive value for the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment.
Infertile couples whose normoovulatory and normomechanical female partners underwent superovulation and intrauterine insemination were investigated. The semen profile of the male partner was discounted. In 160 couples, 544 cycles were obtained, resulting in 59 ongoing pregnancies (10.84%/cycle, 36.87%/patient).
The only parameter found to be significantly correlated with a positive outcome was the degree of sperm motility following preparation for intrauterine insemination. Close to half (47.5%) of the couples with a very good or an excellent degree of sperm motility conceived, whereas only 8.3% of those patients who had poor or fair sperm motility conceived. None of the semen characteristics, such as volume, count, percentage motility, or percentage normal morphology, were found to correlate with cycle outcome. Although there was a progressive increase in the pregnancy rate with an increase in the total number of motile sperm inseminated, it did not reach significance. Seventy percent of the pregnancies were achieved within a maximum of three treatment cycles. The spermatogram is not accurate enough as a prognostic factor for treatment outcome.
The degree of sperm motility, after appropriate preparation for intrauterine insemination, is the only parameter to be correlated with treatment outcome. For couples with a normal female partner, we suggest a maximum of three treatment cycles of induction of ovulation and intrauterine insemination, whenever good progressive motile sperm is obtained after suitable preparation. For cases with poor sperm progression, we suggest appropriate couple counseling and that an alternative assisted reproduction procedure be taken into consideration.
我们的目的是评估一个或多个精子参数对宫腔内人工授精治疗结果是否具有预测价值。
对排卵正常且机械功能正常的女性伴侣接受超排卵和宫腔内人工授精的不育夫妇进行研究。排除男性伴侣的精液情况。160对夫妇共进行了544个周期的治疗,最终有59例持续妊娠(每个周期为10.84%,每位患者为36.87%)。
唯一被发现与阳性结果显著相关的参数是宫腔内人工授精准备后的精子活力程度。精子活力程度非常好或极好的夫妇中近一半(47.5%)受孕,而精子活力差或中等的患者中只有8.3%受孕。未发现精液的任何特征,如体积、数量、活力百分比或正常形态百分比与周期结果相关。尽管随着授精时活动精子总数的增加妊娠率有逐渐上升,但未达到显著水平。70%的妊娠在最多三个治疗周期内实现。精液分析作为治疗结果的预后因素不够准确。
经过适当准备用于宫腔内人工授精后的精子活力程度是唯一与治疗结果相关的参数。对于女性伴侣正常的夫妇,我们建议只要在适当准备后获得良好的进行性活动精子,最多进行三个周期的促排卵和宫腔内人工授精治疗。对于精子进展不佳的情况,我们建议进行适当的夫妇咨询,并考虑采用替代的辅助生殖程序。