• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自尊与失败后优势和劣势的认知可及性

Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure.

作者信息

Dodgson P G, Wood J V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jul;75(1):178-97. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.178.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.178
PMID:9686458
Abstract

People with high self-esteem (HSEs) respond less negatively to failure than people with low self-esteem (LSEs). This difference may occur because HSEs overcome the natural tendency to focus on negative thoughts after failure, and instead focus on their strengths. In 2 experiments, participants with high and low self-esteem received failure, success, or no feedback. Accessibility of strengths and weaknesses was measured by response latency on an unrelated task. Results confirmed that although strengths were typically more accessible than weaknesses for both groups, the discrepancy was larger for HSEs after failure feedback than after no feedback. This heightened discrepancy appears to result from HSEs recruiting their strengths and suppressing their weaknesses. In contrast, LSEs' weaknesses appeared to become especially accessible after failure. These results have implications for the mood-congruent cognition and self-esteem literatures.

摘要

高自尊者(HSEs)比低自尊者(LSEs)对失败的负面反应更少。这种差异可能是因为高自尊者克服了失败后专注于消极想法的自然倾向,转而关注自身优势。在两项实验中,高自尊和低自尊的参与者分别收到失败、成功或无反馈信息。通过一项无关任务的反应潜伏期来衡量优势和劣势的易及性。结果证实,虽然两组参与者的优势通常都比劣势更容易被提取,但在收到失败反馈后,高自尊者的这种差异比无反馈时更大。这种差异的加剧似乎是由于高自尊者发挥自身优势并抑制自身劣势。相比之下,低自尊者的劣势在失败后似乎变得格外容易被提取。这些结果对情绪一致性认知和自尊文献具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure.自尊与失败后优势和劣势的认知可及性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jul;75(1):178-97. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.178.
2
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory: self-esteem differences in the experience and anticipation of success.在胜利的边缘自取失败:成功体验与预期中的自尊差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):764-80. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.764.
3
Self-esteem maintenance processes: why low self-esteem may be resistant to change.自尊维护过程:为何低自尊可能难以改变。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jul;29(7):920-33. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029007010.
4
Is it really "all in their heads"? How self-esteem predicts partner responsiveness.真的是“全在他们脑子里”吗?自尊如何预测伴侣的反应能力。
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):990-1002. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12370. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Seeing failure in your life: Imagery perspective determines whether self-esteem shapes reactions to recalled and imagined failure.生活中的失败体验:意象视角决定了自尊如何影响对回忆和想象中失败的反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1157-73. doi: 10.1037/a0026105. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
6
This mood is familiar and I don't deserve to feel better anyway: mechanisms underlying self-esteem differences in motivation to repair sad moods.这种情绪很熟悉,反正我也不值得感觉更好:修复悲伤情绪动机中自尊差异的潜在机制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):363-80. doi: 10.1037/a0012881.
7
Perceived regard explains self- esteem differences in expressivity.感知尊重解释了表达性自尊差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;38(9):1144-56. doi: 10.1177/0146167212445790. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
Strategies of social comparison among people with low self-esteem: self-protection and self-enhancement.自卑者的社会比较策略:自我保护与自我提升。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):713-31. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.713.
9
Self-esteem and causal attributions.自尊与因果归因。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1997 Nov;123(4):479-91.
10
Self-image resilience and dissonance: the role of affirmational resources.自我形象的恢复力与失调:肯定性资源的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):885-96. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.885.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational Expectations and Academic Persistence among Rural Adolescents: The Protective Role of High Self-Esteem.农村青少年的教育期望与学业坚持性:高自尊的保护作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;14(10):888. doi: 10.3390/bs14100888.
2
Negative affect influences suicide-specific attentional biases.消极情绪会影响特定于自杀的注意偏向。
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2024 Sep;7. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100081. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Psychological readiness of football players for the match and its connection with self-esteem and competitive anxiety.
足球运动员对比赛的心理准备及其与自尊和比赛焦虑的关系。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 11;10(6):e27608. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27608. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
4
The Relationship between Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, and Career Decision-Making Difficulties: Psychological Flourishing as a Mediator.自尊、自我效能感与职业决策困难之间的关系:心理蓬勃发展作为中介变量
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Aug 23;13(9):1553-1568. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13090113.
5
Neuroticism and Stress in Older Adults: The Buffering Role of Self-Esteem.神经质和老年人压力:自尊的缓冲作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 12;20(12):6102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126102.
6
Suicide-related construct accessibility and attention disengagement bias in suicide ideation.自杀意念中与自杀相关的结构可及性和注意力脱离偏向。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Feb;132(2):173-184. doi: 10.1037/abn0000808.
7
The stability of the twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: A study of Chinese secondary school students.学术自我概念双重多维性的稳定性:一项针对中国中学生的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1001187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001187. eCollection 2022.
8
Does attending elite colleges matter in the relationship between self-esteem and general self-efficacy of students in China?在中国,就读精英大学对学生自尊与一般自我效能感之间的关系有影响吗?
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 13;8(6):e09723. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09723. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Mediators and Moderators of Reinforced Self-Affirmation as a Method for Reducing the Memory Misinformation Effect.强化自我肯定作为一种减少记忆错误信息效应方法的中介因素和调节因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 23;12:666707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666707. eCollection 2021.
10
How Power Influences Decision-Makers' Investment Behavior in the Domains of Loss and Gain.权力如何影响决策者在得失领域的投资行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 6;18(23):12834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312834.