• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺创伤治疗中关键因素的描述。

Delineation of critical factors in the treatment of pancreatic trauma.

作者信息

Heitsch R C, Knutson C O, Fulton R L, Jones C E

出版信息

Surgery. 1976 Oct;80(4):523-9.

PMID:968736
Abstract

An analysis of 100 patients sustaining multiple injury and pancreatic trauma was completed. Sixteen patients with penetrating injury died within the first 24 hours, 14 of whom died intraoperatively from major hepatic and/or retroperitoneal venous injury. Eighty-four patients survived long enough to permit evaluation of treatment. There was no statistically significant relationship between mode (p = 0.3) or anatomic area (p = 0.5) of injury and death. However, death was more common in the presence of duct injury (p less than 0.0001). Thirty-nine patients were determined to have duct injury and 45 did not. These two groups were equivalent, with the exception of a higher incidence of concomitant bowel injury (p less than 0.05) in those with duct violation. Combined sump and Penrose drainage was found to be adequate treatment of both proximal and distal nonductal injury with no significant difference in mortality or morbidity rates (p = 0.5). Resection of distal ductal injuries as opposed to drainage alone resulted in significantly lower morbidity and mortality rates (p less than 0.05), comparable to those of drained nonductal injuries. No conclusions could be made relevant to proximal duct injuries, except that drainage alone is inadequate. Seventeen (20 percent) of the 84 patients evaluated died. Pancreatic related mortality rate was 17 percent (14 patients). Two of 23 patients with blunt injury (9 percent) and 12 of 61 patients with penetrating injury (20 percent died). Gram-negative sepsis (82 percent) was the most common cause of death (p less than 0.01), and sepsis was correlated with the presence of pancreatic duct (p less than 0.0001) and bowel (p less than 0.001) injury.

摘要

对100例多发伤合并胰腺创伤患者进行了分析。16例穿透伤患者在最初24小时内死亡,其中14例在术中死于严重肝和/或腹膜后静脉损伤。84例患者存活时间足够长,得以进行治疗评估。损伤方式(p = 0.3)或解剖部位(p = 0.5)与死亡之间无统计学显著关系。然而,存在导管损伤时死亡更为常见(p小于0.0001)。39例患者被确定有导管损伤,45例没有。除了导管受损患者中合并肠损伤的发生率较高(p小于0.05)外,这两组情况相当。发现联合使用负压吸引和烟卷引流对近端和远端非导管损伤均为充分的治疗方法,死亡率和发病率无显著差异(p = 0.5)。与单纯引流相比,切除远端导管损伤导致发病率和死亡率显著降低(p小于0.05),与引流的非导管损伤相当。除了单纯引流不充分外,对于近端导管损伤无法得出结论。在接受评估的84例患者中,17例(20%)死亡。胰腺相关死亡率为17%(14例患者)。23例钝性伤患者中有2例(9%)死亡,61例穿透伤患者中有12例(20%)死亡。革兰阴性菌败血症(82%)是最常见的死亡原因(p小于0.01),败血症与胰腺导管(p小于0.0001)和肠(p小于0.001)损伤的存在相关。

相似文献

1
Delineation of critical factors in the treatment of pancreatic trauma.胰腺创伤治疗中关键因素的描述。
Surgery. 1976 Oct;80(4):523-9.
2
Pancreatic injuries resulting from penetrating trauma: a multi-institution review.穿透性创伤所致胰腺损伤:一项多机构综述
Am Surg. 1998 Sep;64(9):838-43; discussion 843-4.
3
[Pancreatic injury in blunt abdominal trauma: early versus late diagnosis and surgical management].[钝性腹部创伤中的胰腺损伤:早期诊断与晚期诊断及手术治疗]
Magy Seb. 2001 Oct;54(5):309-13.
4
Local complications following pancreatic trauma.胰腺创伤后的局部并发症。
Injury. 2009 May;40(5):516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
5
Management of pancreatic injuries.
J Med Assoc Thai. 1994 Nov;77(11):580-7.
6
Diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma.
Am Surg. 1976 Jun;42(6):390-4.
7
Management of pancreatic trauma.胰腺创伤的管理
Ann Surg. 1978 May;187(5):555-64. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197805000-00015.
8
Experience of two trauma-centers with pancreatic injuries requiring immediate surgery.两个创伤中心处理需要立即手术的胰腺损伤的经验。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 May-Jun;55(84):817-20.
9
Pancreatic trauma with proximal duct injury.伴有近端导管损伤的胰腺创伤。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1994;83(3):191-5.
10
Infectious complications following duodenal and/or pancreatic trauma.十二指肠和/或胰腺创伤后的感染性并发症。
Am Surg. 2001 Mar;67(3):227-30; discussion 230-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Two-stage pancreatic head resection after previous damage control surgery in trauma: two rare case reports.创伤后先行损伤控制手术后的两阶段胰头切除术:两例罕见病例报告
BMC Surg. 2020 May 12;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00763-2.
2
Factors affecting morbidity and mortality in pancreatic injuries.影响胰腺损伤发病率和死亡率的因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Apr;42(2):231-5. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0526-8. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?钝性胰腺创伤的管理:有哪些新进展?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun;41(3):239-50. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0510-3. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
4
An analysis of predictors of morbidity after stab wounds of the pancreas in 78 consecutive injuries.对78例连续性胰腺刺伤患者发病预测因素的分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Sep;96(6):427-33. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184901849.
5
Pancreatic trauma: a concise review.胰腺创伤:简要综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9003-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9003.
6
Evaluating blunt pancreatic trauma at whole body CT: current practices and future directions.全身CT评估钝性胰腺创伤:当前实践与未来方向。
Emerg Radiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):517-27. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1133-9. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
Computed tomography for pancreatic injuries in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.儿童钝性腹部创伤中胰腺损伤的 CT 检查。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jul 27;4(7):166-70. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i7.166.
8
A heuristic approach and heretic view on the technical issues and pitfalls in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Jul 14;18:40. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-40.
9
Imaging of blunt pancreatic trauma.钝性胰腺创伤的影像学检查
Emerg Radiol. 2010 Jan;17(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0811-0. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
10
Fracture of the pancreas in two patients after a go-kart accident.两名卡丁车上事故患者的胰腺断裂。
HPB (Oxford). 2001;3(1):3-6. doi: 10.1080/136518201753173872.