• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊腹腔镜手术采用丙泊酚全身麻醉后,地塞米松与氟哌利多引起恶心呕吐的比较

Nausea and vomiting after dexamethasone versus droperidol following outpatient laparoscopy with a propofol-based general anesthetic.

作者信息

Rothenberg D M, McCarthy R J, Peng C C, Normoyle D A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Rush Medical College, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jul;42(6):637-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05294.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05294.x
PMID:9689267
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this randomized, double-blinded study was to compare the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after dexamethasone versus droperidol following gynecologic laparoscopy, a group at high risk for developing PONV.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients who underwent a propofol-based general anesthetic received either dexamethasone 0.17 mg/kg i.v., or droperidol 0.02 mg/kg i.v., just prior to abdominal incision. Nausea, retching, vomiting, degree of sedation, and discharge times were assessed in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), and the Ambulatory Care Unit (ACU). Following hospital discharge (24 h), the patients were contacted by telephone to assess any further complications.

RESULTS

PONV in the PACU (14.6% vs. 14.9%) and ACU (8.3% vs. 14.9%) was as common after dexamethasone as after droperidol. PONV following hospital discharge was, however, less common after dexamethasone than after droperidol (4.2% vs. 17.0%, P = 0.041). Postoperatively, no complications of therapy were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that PONV is similar with dexamethasone and droperidol, but dexamethasone may have a longer duration of action in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy.

摘要

背景

本随机双盲研究的目的是比较地塞米松与氟哌利多用于妇科腹腔镜手术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率及严重程度,该类手术患者发生PONV的风险较高。

方法

95例接受丙泊酚全身麻醉的患者在腹部切口前分别静脉注射0.17mg/kg地塞米松或0.02mg/kg氟哌利多。在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)和门诊护理单元(ACU)评估恶心、干呕、呕吐、镇静程度及出院时间。出院(24小时)后,通过电话联系患者评估有无其他并发症。

结果

地塞米松组与氟哌利多组在PACU(14.6%对14.9%)和ACU(8.3%对14.9%)发生PONV的情况相似。然而,出院后地塞米松组发生PONV的情况少于氟哌利多组(4.2%对17.0%,P = 0.041)。术后未发现治疗相关并发症。

结论

我们得出结论,地塞米松和氟哌利多在预防PONV方面效果相似,但地塞米松对接受妇科腹腔镜手术的患者可能具有更长的作用时间。

相似文献

1
Nausea and vomiting after dexamethasone versus droperidol following outpatient laparoscopy with a propofol-based general anesthetic.门诊腹腔镜手术采用丙泊酚全身麻醉后,地塞米松与氟哌利多引起恶心呕吐的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jul;42(6):637-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05294.x.
2
Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting: comparison of propofol, droperidol and metoclopramide.术后恶心呕吐的治疗:丙泊酚、氟哌利多和甲氧氯普胺的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Feb;43(2):115-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03011251.
3
A comparison of the prophylactic antiemetic effect of ondansetron and droperidol on patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy.昂丹司琼与氟哌利多对妇科腹腔镜手术患者预防性止吐效果的比较。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):797-800. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00015.
4
The prophylactic effect of dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing thyroidectomy: a comparison of droperidol with saline.
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):200-3. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199907000-00036.
5
[Prophylactic use of droperidol for postoperative nausea and vomiting following gynecological laparoscopic surgery under total intravenous anesthesia].[氟哌利多在全静脉麻醉下妇科腹腔镜手术后预防性用于恶心呕吐的研究]
Masui. 2006 Jan;55(1):55-8.
6
Comparison of tropisetron, droperidol, and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery.托烷司琼、氟哌利多与生理盐水预防妇科手术后恶心呕吐的比较。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Mar;84(3):662-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199703000-00036.
7
A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as antiemetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures. S3A-409 and S3A-410 Study Groups.昂丹司琼与氟哌利多作为择期门诊手术抗呕吐药的疗效、安全性及患者满意度比较。S3A - 409和S3A - 410研究组。
Anesth Analg. 1998 Apr;86(4):731-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00011.
8
Effect of low-dose propofol combined with dexamethasone on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynaecological day surgery under remimazolam-based general anesthesia.瑞马唑仑全麻下妇科日间手术中低剂量异丙酚联合地塞米松预防术后恶心呕吐的效果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 10;102(10):e33249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033249.
9
Effects of ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.昂丹司琼预防儿童术后恶心呕吐的效果
Anesthesiology. 1994 Oct;81(4):804-10. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199410000-00006.
10
Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients during menstruation: comparison of droperidol, metoclopramide and granisetron.月经期间女性患者术后恶心呕吐的预防:氟哌利多、甲氧氯普胺和格拉司琼的比较
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;80(2):248-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.2.248.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the impact of dexamethasone on postoperative pain in adults undergoing general anaesthesia for elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.地塞米松对择期腹部手术全身麻醉的成年患者术后疼痛有何影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Mar 24;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00243-6.
2
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
3
Intraperitoneal dexamethasone as a new method for relieving postoperative shoulder pain after gynecologic laparoscopy.
腹腔内注射地塞米松作为缓解妇科腹腔镜术后肩部疼痛的新方法。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;6(1):59-64. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
4
Intravenous droperidol: a review of its use in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.静脉注射氟哌利多:其用于术后恶心呕吐管理的综述
Drugs. 2006;66(16):2123-47. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666160-00009.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.预防术后恶心呕吐的药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004125.pub2.