• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急避孕的Yuzpe方案有效性的新估计。

New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.

作者信息

Trussell J, Rodríguez G, Ellertson C

机构信息

Office of Population Research, Princeton University, NJ 08544, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 1998 Jun;57(6):363-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00042-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00042-0
PMID:9693395
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide new estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception and to offer correctly computed estimates of the confidence intervals for estimated effectiveness rates. Through a literature search, seven studies that present the number of women treated and outcome of treatment by cycle day of unprotected intercourse relative to expected day of ovulation were identified. Probabilities of conception by cycle day of intercourse among women not using contraception and the associated variance-covariance matrix from five other datasets were estimated, and these external estimates were used to assess the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen. The 40 estimates of effectiveness, based on seven separate studies and the seven studies combined and five different sets of conception probabilities by cycle day, ranged from a low of 44.2% to a high of 88.7%. The preferred point estimate is that emergency contraceptive pills reduce the risk of pregnancy by 75.4%, with a 95% confidence interval extending from 65.6% to 82.4%. True effectiveness is likely to be at least 75% because treatment failures (observed pregnancies) include women who were already pregnant when treated and women who became pregnant after being treated.

摘要

本研究的目的是提供对尤兹佩紧急避孕法有效性的新估计,并给出估计有效率的置信区间的正确计算值。通过文献检索,确定了七项研究,这些研究呈现了接受治疗的女性数量以及相对于预期排卵日按未采取保护措施性交的周期日划分的治疗结果。估计了未使用避孕措施的女性按性交周期日的受孕概率以及来自其他五个数据集的相关方差 - 协方差矩阵,并使用这些外部估计值来评估尤兹佩方案的有效性。基于七项单独研究、七项研究合并以及按周期日划分的五组不同受孕概率得出的40个有效性估计值,范围从低至44.2%到高至88.7%。首选的点估计值是紧急避孕药将怀孕风险降低75.4%,95%置信区间从65.6%延伸至82.4%。实际有效性可能至少为75%,因为治疗失败(观察到的怀孕情况)包括治疗时已怀孕的女性以及治疗后怀孕的女性。

相似文献

1
New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.紧急避孕的Yuzpe方案有效性的新估计。
Contraception. 1998 Jun;57(6):363-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00042-0.
2
Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.紧急避孕的Yuzpe方案有效性的最新估计。
Contraception. 1999 Mar;59(3):147-51. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00018-9.
3
Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol, and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception.尤兹佩方案、达那唑和米非司酮(RU486)用于口服性交后避孕的比较。
BMJ. 1992 Oct 17;305(6859):927-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6859.927.
4
Effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception by cycle day of intercourse: implications for mechanism of action.性交周期日对尤兹佩紧急避孕方案有效性的影响:对作用机制的启示
Contraception. 2003 Mar;67(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00486-9.
5
A reassessment of efficacy of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.对尤兹佩紧急避孕方案疗效的重新评估。
Hum Reprod. 1997 Mar;12(3):496-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.496.
6
Post-ovulatory contraception.排卵后避孕
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Jun;4(2):283-91. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80227-5.
7
Emergency contraception: a review.紧急避孕:综述
Contraception. 1994 Aug;50(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90046-9.
8
Postcoital contraception. Has its day come?性交后避孕。它的时代来临了吗?
J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Nov-Dec;39(6):363-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90155-4.
9
The effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.尤兹佩紧急避孕方案的有效性。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Mar-Apr;28(2):58-64, 87.
10
Statistical evidence about the mechanism of action of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception.关于尤兹佩紧急避孕方案作用机制的统计学证据。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;93(5 Pt 2):872-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00380-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience with oral emergency contraception since the OTC switch in Germany.自德国非处方销售转换以来的口服紧急避孕药使用经验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Mar;295(3):651-660. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4253-0. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
2
Emergency contraception: Knowledge and practice among women and the spouses seeking termination of pregnancy.紧急避孕:寻求终止妊娠的女性及其配偶的知识与实践。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Apr;72(2):116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
3
Safety and effectiveness data for emergency contraceptive pills among women with obesity: a systematic review.
肥胖女性使用紧急避孕药的安全性和有效性数据:一项系统评价
Contraception. 2016 Dec;94(6):605-611. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Mifepristone 5 mg versus 10 mg for emergency contraception: double-blind randomized clinical trial.米非司酮5毫克与10毫克用于紧急避孕的双盲随机临床试验。
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Jan 12;7:95-102. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S65793. eCollection 2015.
5
New and emerging contraceptives: a state-of-the-art review.新型及新兴避孕药具:最新综述
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Feb 19;6:221-34. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S46811. eCollection 2014.
6
Thoughts for the future.对未来的思考。
J Sci Res Med Sci. 2000 Jan;2(1):1-2.
7
Female attraction to appetitive-aggressive men is modulated by women's menstrual cycle and men's vulnerability to traumatic stress.女性对具有欲望攻击性的男性的吸引力会受到女性月经周期以及男性遭受创伤性应激易感性的调节。
Evol Psychol. 2013 Mar 20;11(1):248-62. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100122.
8
Ulipristal blocks ovulation by inhibiting progesterone receptor-dependent pathways intrinsic to the ovary.屈螺酮通过抑制卵巢内源性依赖孕激素受体的途径来阻止排卵。
Reprod Sci. 2013 Apr;20(4):371-81. doi: 10.1177/1933719112459239. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
Efficacy and safety of a levonorgestrel enteric-coated tablet as an over-the-counter drug for emergency contraception: a Phase IV clinical trial.左炔诺孕酮肠溶片作为非处方药用于紧急避孕的有效性和安全性:一项四期临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep;26(9):2316-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der181. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
10
Ulipristal acetate: a review of its use in emergency contraception.醋酸乌利司他:在紧急避孕中的应用综述。
Drugs. 2011 May 7;71(7):935-45. doi: 10.2165/11207410-000000000-00000.