Suppr超能文献

尤兹佩方案、达那唑和米非司酮(RU486)用于口服性交后避孕的比较。

Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol, and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception.

作者信息

Webb A M, Russell J, Elstein M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Manchester.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Oct 17;305(6859):927-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6859.927.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and acceptability of three regimens of postcoital contraception.

DESIGN

Randomised group comparison of ethinyloestradiol 100 micrograms plus levonorgestrel 500 micrograms repeated after 12 hours (Yuzpe method); danazol 600 mg repeated after 12 hours; and mifepristone 600 mg single dose.

SETTING

Community family planning clinic.

SUBJECTS

616 consecutive women with regular cycles aged 16 to 45 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of pregnancies, incidence of side effects, and timing of next period.

RESULTS

The raw pregnancy rates (with 95% confidence intervals) for the Yuzpe, danazol, and mifepristone groups were 2.62% (0.86% to 6.00%), 4.66% (2.15% to 8.67%), and 0% (0% to 1.87%) respectively. Overall, these rates differed significantly (chi 2 = 8.988, df = 2; p = 0.011). The differences between the mifepristone and Yuzpe groups and between the mifepristone and danazol groups were also significant. Side effects were more common and more severe in the Yuzpe group (133 women (70%)) than in either the danazol group (58 (30%)) or the mifepristone group (72 (37%)). The Yuzpe regimen tended to induce bleeding early but mifepristone prolonged the cycle. Three women bled more than seven days late in the Yuzpe group compared with 49 in the mifepristone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone was effective in reducing expected pregnancy rates and the Yuzpe method also had a clinical effect. Danazol had little or no effect. A further multicentre trial is needed.

摘要

目的

比较三种性交后避孕方案的有效性和可接受性。

设计

对炔雌醇100微克加左炔诺孕酮500微克并在12小时后重复用药(尤兹佩法)、达那唑600毫克并在12小时后重复用药、米非司酮600毫克单剂量进行随机分组比较。

地点

社区计划生育诊所。

研究对象

616名年龄在16至45岁、月经周期规律的连续就诊女性。

主要观察指标

妊娠数、副作用发生率及下次月经时间。

结果

尤兹佩法组、达那唑组和米非司酮组的原始妊娠率(95%置信区间)分别为2.62%(0.86%至6.00%)、4.66%(2.15%至8.67%)和0%(0%至1.87%)。总体而言,这些比率差异显著(χ² = 8.988,自由度 = 2;p = 0.011)。米非司酮组与尤兹佩法组之间以及米非司酮组与达那唑组之间的差异也显著。尤兹佩法组的副作用比达那唑组(58例(30%))或米非司酮组(72例(37%))更常见且更严重(133名女性(70%))。尤兹佩法方案倾向于使出血提前,但米非司酮会延长周期。尤兹佩法组有3名女性月经推迟超过7天,而米非司酮组有49名。

结论

米非司酮在降低预期妊娠率方面有效,尤兹佩法也有临床效果。达那唑几乎没有效果。需要进一步进行多中心试验。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Yuzpe regimen, danazol, and mifepristone (RU486) in oral postcoital contraception.
BMJ. 1992 Oct 17;305(6859):927-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6859.927.
2
Emergency contraception: a review.
Contraception. 1994 Aug;50(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90046-9.
3
Postcoital contraception. Has its day come?
J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Nov-Dec;39(6):363-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(94)90155-4.
4
Postcoital contraception: present and future options.
J Adolesc Health. 1995 Jan;16(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(94)00055-J.
5
Mifepristone (RU 486) compared with high-dose estrogen and progestogen for emergency postcoital contraception.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 8;327(15):1041-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210083271501.
6
Hormonal postcoital contraception with an ethinylestradiol-norgestrel combination and two danazol regimens.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990 Dec;37(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90032-v.
7
Interventions for emergency contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5.
8
Interventions for emergency contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 20;1(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6.
9
Post-ovulatory contraception.
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Jun;4(2):283-91. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80227-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for emergency contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 20;1(1):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub6.
2
Interventions for emergency contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5.
3
Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis.
Fertil Res Pract. 2015 May 5;1:6. doi: 10.1186/2054-7099-1-6. eCollection 2015.
4
Safety data for levonorgestrel, ulipristal acetate and Yuzpe regimens for emergency contraception.
Contraception. 2016 Feb;93(2):93-112. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Emerging options for emergency contraception.
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2013 Feb 18;7:23-35. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S8145.
7
Ectopic pregnancy and emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1263-1266. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dd22ef.
10
How safe is emergency contraception?
Drug Saf. 2002;25(10):695-706. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225100-00002.

本文引用的文献

6
Interception. IV: Failure of mifepristone (RU 486) as a monthly contragestive, "Lunarette".
Contraception. 1987 May;35(5):433-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90079-5.
7
Interception. III: Postcoital luteal contragestion by an antiprogestin (mifepristone, RU 486) in 62 women.
Contraception. 1987 May;35(5):423-31. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90078-3.
8
Post-coital contraception: an overview of published studies.
Contraception. 1989 Apr;39(4):459-68. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90123-6.
9
Hormonal postcoital contraception with an ethinylestradiol-norgestrel combination and two danazol regimens.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990 Dec;37(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(90)90032-v.
10
Interception: post-coital estrogens in 3016 women.
Contraception. 1976 Oct;14(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(76)80052-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验