• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉应答命名过程中的局部脑血流量:跨模态神经激活的证据。

Regional cerebral blood flow during auditory responsive naming: evidence for cross-modality neural activation.

作者信息

Bookheimer S Y, Zeffiro T A, Blaxton T A, Gaillard W D, Malow B, Theodore W H

机构信息

Epilepsy Research Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2409-13. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00047.

DOI:10.1097/00001756-199807130-00047
PMID:9694237
Abstract

One issue of continuing debate in language research concerns whether the brain holds separate representations for semantic information through the auditory vs visual modalities. Regardless of whether we hear, see or read meaningful information, our brains automatically activate both auditory and visual semantic associations to the sensory input. The prominent models for how the brain makes these cross-modality associations holds that semantic information conveyed through either sensory input modality is represented in a shared semantic system comprising the traditionally identified language areas in the brain. A few recent case reports as well as activation imaging studies, have challenged this notion by demonstrating category-specific organization within the semantic system in spatially discrete brain regions. Neither view posits a role for primary sensory cortices in semantic processing. We obtained positron emission tomographic (PET) images while subjects performed an auditory responsive naming task, an auditory analog to visual object naming. Subjects heard and responded to descriptions of concrete objects while blindfolded to prevent visual stimulation. Our results showed that, in addition to traditional language centers, auditory language input produced reciprocal activation in primary and secondary visual brain regions, just as if the language stimuli had entered in the visual modality. These findings provide evidence for a distributed semantic system in which sensory-specific semantic modules are mutually interactive, operating directly onto early sensory processing centers.

摘要

语言研究中持续存在争议的一个问题是,大脑是否通过听觉和视觉模态分别存储语义信息。无论我们是听到、看到还是读到有意义的信息,我们的大脑都会自动将听觉和视觉语义联想与感官输入联系起来。关于大脑如何建立这些跨模态联想的主流模型认为,通过任何一种感官输入模态传达的语义信息都存储在一个共享的语义系统中,该系统由大脑中传统上确定的语言区域组成。最近的一些病例报告以及激活成像研究对这一观点提出了挑战,它们通过在空间上离散的脑区中展示语义系统内特定类别的组织来进行反驳。两种观点都没有假定初级感觉皮层在语义处理中起作用。我们在受试者执行听觉反应命名任务(一种视觉物体命名的听觉模拟任务)时获得了正电子发射断层扫描(PET)图像。受试者在蒙眼以防止视觉刺激的情况下,听到并对具体物体的描述做出反应。我们的结果表明,除了传统的语言中枢外,听觉语言输入在初级和次级视觉脑区产生了相互激活,就好像语言刺激是以视觉模态输入的一样。这些发现为分布式语义系统提供了证据,在该系统中,特定感官的语义模块相互作用,直接作用于早期感官处理中心。

相似文献

1
Regional cerebral blood flow during auditory responsive naming: evidence for cross-modality neural activation.听觉应答命名过程中的局部脑血流量:跨模态神经激活的证据。
Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2409-13. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00047.
2
Human brain plasticity: evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experience.人类大脑可塑性:来自感觉剥夺和语言体验改变的证据。
Prog Brain Res. 2002;138:177-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)38078-6.
3
Visual word stem completion priming within and across modalities: a PET study.跨感觉通道及通道内视觉词干补全启动效应:一项正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Neuroreport. 1999 Jul 13;10(10):2061-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199907130-00013.
4
Regional response differences within the human auditory cortex when listening to words.人类听觉皮层在听单词时的区域反应差异。
Neurosci Lett. 1992 Nov 9;146(2):179-82. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90072-f.
5
Auditory priming within and across modalities: evidence from positron emission tomography.模态内和模态间的听觉启动:正电子发射断层扫描的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Jul;11(4):337-48. doi: 10.1162/089892999563463.
6
Neural correlates of naming animals from their characteristic sounds.
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(7):847-54. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00223-3.
7
Negative BOLD in sensory cortices during verbal memory: a component in generating internal representations?言语记忆过程中感觉皮层的负性血氧水平依赖信号:生成内部表征的一个组成部分?
Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):221-31. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0089-2. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
8
Selective tuning of the left and right auditory cortices during spatially directed attention.空间定向注意过程中左右听觉皮层的选择性调谐。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999 Jan;7(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00036-6.
9
Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users.以英国手语和视听英语为母语的使用者的神经系统处理机制。
Brain. 2002 Jul;125(Pt 7):1583-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf153.
10
Crossmodal recruitment of primary visual cortex following brief exposure to bimodal audiovisual stimuli.短暂暴露于视听双模态刺激后初级视皮层的跨模态募集。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to Measuring Language Lateralisation: An Exploratory Study Comparing Two fMRI Methods and Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound.测量语言侧化的方法:一项比较两种功能磁共振成像方法和功能性经颅多普勒超声的探索性研究。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Jun 3;5(2):409-431. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00136. eCollection 2024.
2
Spoken language processing activates the primary visual cortex.口语处理激活初级视觉皮层。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0289671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289671. eCollection 2023.
3
Naming in Older Adults: Complementary Auditory and Visual Assessment.
老年人命名:听觉与视觉的互补评估。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Jul;28(6):574-587. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000552. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
Neurobiological Correlates of Inhibition of the Right Broca Homolog during New-Word Learning.新词学习过程中右侧布洛卡同源区抑制的神经生物学关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 28;10:371. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00371. eCollection 2016.
5
On the 'visual' in 'audio-visual integration': a hypothesis concerning visual pathways.论“视听整合”中的“视觉”:关于视觉通路的一种假说
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jun;232(6):1631-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3927-8. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
6
Shared space, separate processes: Neural activation patterns for auditory description and visual object naming in healthy adults.共享空间,独立过程:健康成年人中听觉描述和视觉物体命名的神经激活模式
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2507-20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22345. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
7
Using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to assess language lateralisation: Influence of task and difficulty level.使用功能经颅多普勒超声评估语言侧化:任务和难度水平的影响。
Laterality. 2012;17(6):694-710. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2011.615128. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
8
Co-localisation of abnormal brain structure and function in specific language impairment.特定语言障碍中异常脑结构和功能的共定位。
Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):310-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
9
Auditory confrontation naming in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者的听觉对抗命名。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Nov;24(8):1326-38. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.518977. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
10
The influence of colour and sound on neuronal activation during visual object naming.视觉物体命名过程中颜色和声音对神经元激活的影响。
Brain Res. 2008 Nov 19;1241(1):92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.037. Epub 2008 Aug 26.