Suppr超能文献

神经系统疾病患者寡克隆区带的检测:琼脂糖凝胶电泳、免疫固定电泳和等电聚焦电泳的比较

Detection of oligoclonal bands in patients with neurologic diseases: comparison between agarose gel-, immunofixation- and isoelectric-focusing electrophoresis.

作者信息

Shan D E, Yeh S I

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1998 Jul;61(7):375-81.

PMID:9699389
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The presence of oligoclonal bands (OCBs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) often implies the involvement of the humoral immune response in the disease process. We compared three methods of electrophoresis to determine the frequency and pattern of OCBs in Chinese patients with various neurologic diseases.

METHODS

CSF samples and matched serum samples were collected from 122 patients. OCBs were examined in all the CSF samples after agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) or isoelectric-focusing electrophoresis (IEF); some samples were selected and concentrated for immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE).

RESULTS

While 46.7% of the CSF samples showed elevated immunoglobulins using AGE, OCBs were unequivocally identified in 16.4% of samples. In contrast, the detection rate of OCBs using IEF was 54.1%, while that of monoclonal bands was 4.9%. Some OCBs could be detected by IFE, which demonstrated that most of them were IgG-kappa. Using IEF, the sensitivity was 66.7% in multiple sclerosis, 47.8% in myelopathy, 88.9% in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 62.5% in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, 80.0% in meningoencephalitis and 23.0% in other neurologic diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

IEF was the most sensitive method for detecting OCBs. Most patients with type 2 or type 3 patterns of OCBs had multiple sclerosis or meningoencephalitis, although some of these patients may present with a type 4 pattern. Most patients with other diseases had identical patterns of OCBs in both serum and CSF.

摘要

背景

脑脊液(CSF)中寡克隆带(OCB)的存在通常意味着体液免疫反应参与了疾病进程。我们比较了三种电泳方法,以确定中国各种神经系统疾病患者中OCB的频率和模式。

方法

收集了122例患者的脑脊液样本和配对血清样本。在进行琼脂糖凝胶电泳(AGE)或等电聚焦电泳(IEF)后,对所有脑脊液样本进行OCB检测;选择一些样本进行浓缩后进行免疫固定电泳(IFE)。

结果

使用AGE时,46.7%的脑脊液样本显示免疫球蛋白升高,而16.4%的样本明确检测到OCB。相比之下,使用IEF检测OCB的阳性率为54.1%,单克隆带的阳性率为4.9%。IFE可检测到一些OCB,表明其中大多数为IgG-κ型。使用IEF时,多发性硬化症的敏感性为66.7%,脊髓病为47.8%,慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病为88.9%,急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病为62.5%,脑膜脑炎为80.0%,其他神经系统疾病为23.0%。

结论

IEF是检测OCB最敏感的方法。大多数具有2型或3型OCB模式的患者患有多发性硬化症或脑膜脑炎,尽管其中一些患者可能表现为4型模式。大多数其他疾病患者的血清和脑脊液中OCB模式相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验