Mecklinger A
Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 1998 May;36(5):441-60. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00128-0.
Event-related potentials from 61 scalp sites were used to examine the brain processes subserving recognition memory for object forms and spatial locations. Subjects memorized line drawings of highly familiar objects and their spatial locations within a two-dimensional matrix. Prior to the test phases a cue indicated whether object-based or spatially-based recognition judgements were required. Recognition judgements were faster and more accurate for spatially-based than for object-based judgements. A variety of topographical differences in the ERP waveforms as a function of recognition task emerged: First, when the cue indicated that object-based judgements were required, negative slow wave activity extending for several hundred ms with a maximum at frontal recording sites was obtained. Conversely when spatially-based judgements were required, slow wave activity developed over parieto-occipital areas. Second, early portions of the old/new effects evoked by the test items (i.e. 300-600 ms after stimulus onset) showed a similar anterior-posterior dissociation as a function of recognition task. Third, for object-based, but not for spatially-based, judgements, late old/new effects (i.e. 700-1600 ms) were found with a clear maximum at right frontal recordings. The results are consistent with the view that functionally and anatomically different brain systems are involved in recognition memory for object form and spatial location. They further suggest that the retrieval of object forms involves conceptual semantic integration processes.
来自61个头皮部位的事件相关电位被用于研究支持对物体形状和空间位置的识别记忆的大脑过程。受试者记住了非常熟悉的物体的线条图及其在二维矩阵中的空间位置。在测试阶段之前,一个提示表明需要基于物体还是基于空间的识别判断。基于空间的识别判断比基于物体的判断更快、更准确。作为识别任务的函数,ERP波形出现了各种地形差异:首先,当提示表明需要基于物体的判断时,获得了在额叶记录部位达到最大值、持续数百毫秒的负向慢波活动。相反,当需要基于空间的判断时,慢波活动出现在顶枕区域。其次,测试项目诱发的新旧效应的早期部分(即刺激开始后300 - 600毫秒)显示出与识别任务相关的类似前后分离。第三,对于基于物体而非基于空间的判断,发现了晚期新旧效应(即700 - 1600毫秒),在右额叶记录部位有明显的最大值。结果与以下观点一致,即功能上和解剖学上不同的大脑系统参与了对物体形状和空间位置的识别记忆。它们进一步表明,物体形状的检索涉及概念语义整合过程。