Condrell C, Karp S A, Holmstrom R W, Silber D E
Department of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Jun;86(3 Pt 2):1187-91. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1187.
The present study investigated relationships between judges' ratings of hostility from the content of eight TAT-like stories and scores on Hostile Feelings and Hostile Actions scales of the Apperceptive Personality Test. This test was administered to 104 college students volunteers (53 women, 51 men), who received extra credit on examination scores for their participation. Each subject made up 8 stories to stimulus pictures and then filled out 8 objectively scorable questionnaires about their stories from the Apperceptive Personality Test. The stories were rated by two "blind" judges for hostile feelings and hostile activities using Fine's 1955 scoring criteria. Agreement of judges ranged from .47 to .80. Correlations of judge's ratings with Apperceptive Personality Test scores were .13 for Hostile Feelings and .41 (df = 102, p < .01) for Hostile Actions. Thus questionnaires scores for Hostile Feelings are unrelated and scores for Hostile Actions only moderately related to judge's ratings of story content.
本研究调查了从八个类似主题统觉测验（TAT）的故事内容中判断出的敌意评分与领悟性人格测验中敌意感受量表和敌意行为量表得分之间的关系。该测验施测于104名大学生志愿者（53名女性，51名男性），他们因参与测验而在考试成绩上获得额外加分。每位受试者根据刺激图片编造8个故事，然后填写8份来自领悟性人格测验的、可客观计分的关于其故事的问卷。两位“盲”评委根据1955年费恩的计分标准，对故事的敌意感受和敌意活动进行评分。评委之间的一致性范围为 .47至 .80。评委评分与领悟性人格测验得分的相关性，敌意感受方面为 .13，敌意行为方面为 .41（自由度 = 102，p < .01）。因此，敌意感受的问卷得分不相关，而敌意行为的得分仅与评委对故事内容的评分中度相关。
