Smith C E, Desai R, Glorioso V, Cooper A, Pinchak A C, Hagen K F
Department of Anesthesiology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 1998 Aug;10(5):380-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(98)00049-x.
To test the hypothesis that warming intravenous (i.v.) fluids in conjunction with convective warming results in less intraoperative hypothermia (core temperature < 36.0 degrees C) than that seen with convective warming alone.
Prospective, randomized study.
University affiliated tertiary care teaching hospital.
61 ASA physical status, I, II, and III adults undergoing major surgery and general anesthesia with isoflurane.
All patients received convective warming. Group 1 patients received warmed fluids (setpoint 42 degrees C). Group 2 patients received room temperature fluids (approximately 21 degrees C).
Lowest and final intraoperative distal esophageal temperatures were higher (p < 0.05) in Group 1 (mean +/- SEM: 35.8 +/- 0.1 degrees C and 36.6 +/- 0.1 degrees C) versus Group 2 (35.4 +/- 0.1 degrees C and 36.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C, respectively). Compared with Group 1, more Group 2 patients were hypothermic at the end of anesthesia (10 of 26 patients, or 38.5% vs. 4 of 30 patients, or 13%; p < 0.05). After 30 minutes in the recovery room, there were no differences in temperature between groups (36.7 +/- 0.1 degrees C and 36.5 +/- 0.1 degrees C in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). Intraoperative cessation of convective warming because of core temperature greater than 37 degrees C was required in 33% of Group 1 patients (vs. 11.5% in Group 2; p = 0.052).
The combination of convective and fluid warming was associated with a decreased likelihood of patients leaving the operating room hypothermic. However, average final temperatures were greater than 36 degrees C in both groups, and intergroup differences were small. Care must be taken to avoid overheating the patient when both warming modalities are employed together.
检验以下假设,即静脉输液加温联合对流加温导致术中体温过低(核心温度<36.0℃)的情况比单纯对流加温更少。
前瞻性随机研究。
大学附属三级护理教学医院。
61例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I、II和III级的成年患者,接受异氟烷全身麻醉下的大手术。
所有患者均接受对流加温。第1组患者接受加温液体(设定温度42℃)。第2组患者接受室温液体(约21℃)。
第1组(平均值±标准误:35.8±0.1℃和36.6±0.1℃)术中最低及最终食管远端温度高于第2组(分别为35.4±0.1℃和36.±0.1℃,p<0.05)。与第1组相比,第2组更多患者在麻醉结束时体温过低(26例患者中有10例,即38.5%,而30例患者中有4例,即13%;p<0.05)。在恢复室30分钟后,两组间体温无差异(第1组和第2组分别为36.7±0.1℃和36.5±0.1℃)。第1组33%的患者因核心温度高于37℃而术中停止对流加温(第2组为11.5%;p=0.052)。
对流加温和液体加温相结合可降低患者离开手术室时体温过低的可能性。然而,两组的平均最终温度均高于36℃,组间差异较小。同时采用两种加温方式时必须注意避免患者过热。