• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体思维的社会身份维持模型。

A Social Identity Maintenance Model of Groupthink.

作者信息

Turner ME, Pratkanis AR

机构信息

San Jose State University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):210-35. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2757.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2757
PMID:9705803
Abstract

We present a social identity maintenance model of groupthink that (a) defines groupthink as a collective attempt to maintain a positive image of the group, (b) identifies conditions under which this form of concurrence seeking is likely to occur, (c) parsimoniously explains the equivocal empirical findings on groupthink, and (d) specifies intervention tactics that can mitigate the detrimental consequences of groupthink for group decision outcomes. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

摘要

我们提出了一种群体思维的社会身份维持模型,该模型:(a)将群体思维定义为维护群体正面形象的集体尝试;(b)确定这种形式的趋同寻求可能发生的条件;(c)简洁地解释了关于群体思维的模棱两可的实证研究结果;(d)明确了可以减轻群体思维对群体决策结果的有害影响的干预策略。版权所有1998年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
A Social Identity Maintenance Model of Groupthink.群体思维的社会身份维持模型。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):210-35. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2757.
2
Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes.重塑贾尼斯的群体思维模型:集体效能在决策失败中的关键作用。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):185-209. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2761.
3
Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon.组织性托宁潘迪现象:从群体思维现象的二十五年中汲取的教训
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):163-84. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2760.
4
Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research.25年后依然活跃且发展良好:群体思维研究综述
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):116-41. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2758.
5
Groupthink, Bay of Pigs, and Watergate Reconsidered.对群体思维、猪湾事件和水门事件的重新审视
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):352-61. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2766.
6
Developing Consensus about Groupthink after All These Years.多年之后对群体思维达成共识。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):362-74. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2767.
7
Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: A scoping review.医患护理中医疗专业团队的群体思维:范围综述。
Med Teach. 2022 Mar;44(3):309-318. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward.詹尼斯群体思维理论中的群体动力学:回顾与展望。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):142-62. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2759.
9
The Tendency toward Defective Decision Making within Self-Managing Teams: The Relevance of Groupthink for the 21st Century.自我管理团队中决策失误的倾向:群体思维在21世纪的相关性。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):327-51. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2765.
10
Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam Decisions 25 Years Later: How Well Has the Groupthink Hypothesis Stood the Test of Time?25年后重审猪湾事件和越南战争决策:群体思维假说经受住时间考验的情况如何?
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):236-71. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2762.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Rudeness on NICU Medical Teams Studied by a New Tool for the Assessment of Decision-Making Group Dynamics.一种用于评估决策小组动态的新工具对新生儿重症监护室医疗团队粗鲁行为影响的研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;9(10):1436. doi: 10.3390/children9101436.
2
Clinical reasoning in dire times. Analysis of cognitive biases in clinical cases during the COVID-19 pandemic.艰难时期的临床推理。COVID-19 大流行期间临床病例中的认知偏差分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;17(4):979-988. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02884-9. Epub 2022 Jan 8.