Paulus PB
University of Texas, Arlington
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):362-74. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2767.
The groupthink model is evaluated in the context of the papers of this special issue. The major focus is on the basis for its impact and its scientific status. The groupthink perspective is seen as consistent with some other contributions to the groups literature. Interesting parallels between the groupthink and the brainstorming literature are noted. It is concluded that many of the issues raised by the groupthink model are worthy of further examination in a broad-based study of group decision processes. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
本特刊论文对群体思维模型进行了评估。主要关注其影响的依据及其科学地位。群体思维观点被视为与群体文献中的其他一些贡献相一致。文中指出了群体思维与头脑风暴文献之间有趣的相似之处。得出的结论是，群体思维模型提出的许多问题值得在对群体决策过程的广泛研究中作进一步探讨。版权所有1998年学术出版社。
