Goldhill D R, Sumner A
Department of Anesthetics, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, UK.
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00017.
To identify priorities for intensive care unit (ICU) intervention and research.
Analysis of a large intensive care database.
Twenty-four ICUs in the North Thames region of the United Kingdom.
All patients admitted to an ICU between January 1, 1992, and April 31, 1996, on whom data had been entered into the database. Patients who were admitted after cardiac surgery, who had burns, or were <16 yrs of age were excluded from the study, as were data from patients with a previous ICU admission within 6 mos or where ICU or hospital outcome was unknown. Data were excluded from units that had entered <300 patients into the database.
None.
A total of 23,331 admissions with complete records were available. After exclusions, 12,762 admissions from 15 ICUs were selected for analysis. Hospital mortality was 32.5% with a mortality ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.17). Nonsurvivors were older than survivors and had longer ICU stays. Patients admitted from wards had a higher mortality than patients from the operating room/recovery or the emergency department. Observed percentage mortality increased linearly with mortality predicted by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, although the number of patients who died remained broadly constant across the range of predicted mortality. Twenty-seven percent of all deaths occurred after discharge from the ICU. Patients admitted after cardiopulmonary resuscitation constituted 30% of all deaths. Thirty-four percent of patients were in the ICU for >2 days, and they accounted for nearly 81% of bed days.
Early identification of patients at risk, both before admission and after discharge from the ICU, may allow treatment to decrease mortality. Research and resources may be best directed at patients who die, despite a relatively low predicted mortality. Although these patients are a small percentage of the low-risk admissions, they constitute a large number of ICU deaths. Many patients die after discharge from ICU and this mortality may be decreased by minimizing inappropriate early discharge to the ward, by the provision of high-dependency and step-down units, and by continuing advice and follow-up by the ICU team after the patient has been discharged. Intervention before ICU admission and support of patients after discharge from the ICU should be part of the effort to decrease mortality for ICU patients. Inadequate provision of resources for critically ill patients may result in excess intensive care mortality that is not detected with ICU outcome prediction methods.
确定重症监护病房(ICU)干预措施及研究的重点。
对一个大型重症监护数据库进行分析。
英国北泰晤士地区的24个ICU。
1992年1月1日至1996年4月31日期间入住ICU且数据已录入数据库的所有患者。心脏手术后入院、有烧伤或年龄<16岁的患者被排除在研究之外,6个月内曾入住过ICU或ICU或医院结局未知的患者的数据也被排除。数据录入数据库患者数<300例的科室的数据被排除。
无。
共有23331例有完整记录的入院患者。排除后,选取了15个ICU的12762例入院患者进行分析。医院死亡率为32.5%,死亡比为1.14(95%置信区间1.10至1.17)。非幸存者比幸存者年龄大,ICU住院时间更长。从病房入院的患者死亡率高于从手术室/恢复室或急诊科入院的患者。观察到的死亡百分比随急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II预测的死亡率呈线性增加,尽管在预测死亡率范围内死亡患者数量大致保持不变。所有死亡患者中有27%在从ICU出院后死亡。心肺复苏后入院的患者占所有死亡患者的30%。34%的患者在ICU住院>2天,他们占床位使用天数的近81%。
在入院前及从ICU出院后尽早识别有风险的患者,可能有助于通过治疗降低死亡率。研究和资源可能最好针对那些尽管预测死亡率相对较低但仍死亡的患者。虽然这些患者在低风险入院患者中占比小,但他们构成了大量的ICU死亡病例。许多患者在从ICU出院后死亡,通过尽量减少不适当的早期转至病房、提供高依赖和逐步降级病房,以及在患者出院后由ICU团队持续提供建议和随访,可降低这种死亡率。在ICU入院前进行干预以及在患者从ICU出院后提供支持应成为降低ICU患者死亡率工作的一部分。为重症患者提供资源不足可能导致额外的重症监护死亡率,而ICU结局预测方法无法检测到这一点。