Taylor D A, McGrath J L, Orr L M, Barnes P J, O'Connor B J
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Thorax. 1998 Jun;53(6):483-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.53.6.483.
Nitric oxide (NO) may be bronchoprotective in asthma, possibly due to a direct action on airway smooth muscle or through mast cell stabilisation. To investigate this the effects of two doses of nebulised NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a non-selective NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, on exhaled NO levels and airway responsiveness to histamine, a direct smooth muscle spasmogen, and adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP), an indirect spasmogen which activates mast cells, were evaluated in patients with mild asthma.
The study consisted of two phases each with a double blind, randomised, crossover design. In phase 1, 15 subjects inhaled either L-NAME 54 mg or 0.9% saline 30 minutes before histamine challenge. Nine of these subjects were studied in a similar fashion but were also challenged with AMP. In phase 2, 13 subjects (eight from phase 1) performed the same protocol but inhaled L-NAME in a dose of 170 mg or 0.9% saline before being challenged with histamine and AMP.
The mean (95% CI) reduction in exhaled NO levels after L-NAME 54 mg was 78% (66 to 90) but this did not alter airway responsiveness; the geometric mean (SE) concentration provoking a fall of 20% or more in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) after L-NAME and saline was 0.59 (1.26) and 0.81 (1.26) mg/ml, respectively, for histamine and 20.2 (1.7) and 17.2 (1.6) mg/ml, respectively, for AMP. In contrast, L-NAME 170 mg reduced NO levels to a similar extent (81% (95% CI 76 to 87)) but increased airway responsiveness by approximately one doubling dose to both spasmogens; the geometric mean (SE) PC20 for histamine after L-NAME 170 mg and saline was 0.82 (1.29) and 1.78 (1.19) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001), and for AMP was 11.8 (1.5) and 24.3 (1.4) mg/ml, respectively (p < 0.001).
These results suggest that L-NAME increases airway responsiveness in asthma. This may occur through mechanisms separate from NO inhibition or through pathways independent of those responsible for production of NO measured in exhaled air.
一氧化氮(NO)可能对哮喘具有支气管保护作用,这可能是由于其对气道平滑肌的直接作用或通过稳定肥大细胞实现的。为了对此进行研究,在轻度哮喘患者中评估了两剂雾化吸入的NG-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME,一种非选择性一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制剂)对呼出气NO水平以及气道对组胺(一种直接的平滑肌痉挛剂)和5'-单磷酸腺苷(AMP,一种激活肥大细胞的间接痉挛剂)反应性的影响。
该研究包括两个阶段,每个阶段均采用双盲、随机、交叉设计。在第1阶段,15名受试者在组胺激发试验前30分钟吸入54 mg L-NAME或0.9%盐水。其中9名受试者以类似方式进行研究,但也接受了AMP激发试验。在第2阶段,13名受试者(8名来自第1阶段)执行相同方案,但在接受组胺和AMP激发试验前吸入170 mg L-NAME或0.9%盐水。
吸入54 mg L-NAME后,呼出气NO水平平均(95% CI)降低78%(66%至90%),但这并未改变气道反应性;吸入L-NAME和盐水后,组胺激发试验中使一秒用力呼气量下降20%或更多的几何平均(SE)浓度(PC20)分别为0.59(1.26)和0.81(1.26)mg/ml,AMP激发试验中分别为20.2(1.7)和17.2(1.6)mg/ml。相比之下,吸入170 mg L-NAME使NO水平降低至相似程度(81%(95% CI 76%至87%)),但使气道对两种痉挛剂的反应性增加约一倍剂量;吸入170 mg L-NAME和盐水后,组胺激发试验的几何平均(SE)PC20分别为0.82(1.29)和1.78(1.19)mg/ml(p < 0.001),AMP激发试验中分别为11.8(1.5)和24.3(1.4)mg/ml(p < 0.001)。
这些结果表明,L-NAME会增加哮喘患者的气道反应性。这可能通过与NO抑制无关的机制或通过独立于呼出气中所测NO产生途径的通路发生。