Susin S A, Zamzami N, Kroemer G
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Propre de Recherche 420, 19 rue Guy Môquet, F-94801 Villejuif, France.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Aug 10;1366(1-2):151-65. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00110-8.
Scientific revolution [1] implies a transformation of the world view in which a dominant paradigm is substituted by a new one, one which furnishes an ameliorated comprehension of facts, as well as an advantage for the design of informative experiments. Apoptosis research has recently experienced a change from a paradigm in which the nucleus determined the apoptotic process to a paradigm in which mitochondria constitute the center of death control. Several pieces of evidence imply mitochondria in the process of apoptosis. Kinetic data indicate that mitochondria undergo major changes in membrane integrity before classical signs of apoptosis become manifest. These changes concern both the inner and the outer mitochondrial membranes, leading to a disruption of the inner transmembrane potential (DeltaPsim) and the release of intermembrane proteins through the outer membrane. Cell-free systems of apoptosis demonstrate that mitochondrial products are rate limiting for the activation of caspases and endonucleases in cell extracts. Functional studies indicate that drug-enforced opening or closing of the mitochondrial megachannel (also called permeability transition pore) can induce or prevent apoptosis. The anti-apoptotic oncoprotein Bcl-2 acts on mitochondria to stabilize membrane integrity and to prevent opening of the megachannel. These observations are compatible with a three-step model of apoptosis: a premitochondrial phase during which signal transduction cascades or damage pathways are activated; a mitochondrial phase, during which mitochondrial membrane function is lost; and a post-mitochondrial phase, during which proteins released from mitochondria cause the activation of catabolic proteases and nucleases. The implication of mitochondria in apoptosis has important consequences for the understanding of the normal physiology of apoptosis, its deregulation in cancer and degenerative diseases, and the development of novel cytotoxic and cytoprotective drugs.
科学革命[1]意味着世界观的转变,即一种占主导地位的范式被一种新的范式所取代,这种新范式能提供对事实更好的理解,以及在设计信息丰富的实验方面具有优势。细胞凋亡研究最近经历了从细胞核决定凋亡过程的范式向线粒体构成死亡控制中心的范式的转变。有几条证据表明线粒体参与了细胞凋亡过程。动力学数据表明,在线粒体凋亡的经典特征显现之前,线粒体的膜完整性会发生重大变化。这些变化涉及线粒体内外膜,导致内膜跨膜电位(ΔΨm)的破坏以及膜间蛋白通过外膜的释放。细胞凋亡的无细胞系统表明,线粒体产物是细胞提取物中半胱天冬酶和核酸内切酶激活的限速因素。功能研究表明,药物强制打开或关闭线粒体大通道(也称为通透性转换孔)可诱导或阻止细胞凋亡。抗凋亡癌蛋白Bcl-2作用于线粒体以稳定膜完整性并防止大通道打开。这些观察结果与细胞凋亡的三步模型相符:线粒体前期,在此期间信号转导级联或损伤途径被激活;线粒体期,在此期间线粒体膜功能丧失;线粒体后期,在此期间从线粒体释放的蛋白质导致分解代谢蛋白酶和核酸内切酶的激活。线粒体在细胞凋亡中的作用对于理解细胞凋亡的正常生理学、其在癌症和退行性疾病中的失调以及新型细胞毒性和细胞保护药物的开发具有重要意义。