Heimer R
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA.
Public Health Rep. 1998 Jun;113 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):67-74.
This chapter attempts to describe the factors influencing the transmission of syringe-born viruses, to review the effects of syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in terms of these factors, and to explore the gamut of health-promoting activities of SEPs.
The chapter is divided into six sections: biological factors in syringe-borne viral transmission, behavior and viral transmission, quantifying viral transmission, preventing viral transmission, impediments to preventing viral transmission, and research for preventing viral transmission. Understanding how biological and behavioral factors influence transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis builds a framework to investigate the epidemiology and the impact of SEPs on disease transmission. Even under circumstances in which these programs do not appear to be effective, understanding the implications of the biological and behavioral factors can contribute to our understanding of program benefits and limitations. Furthermore, program benefits may not be restricted to direct effects on disease transmission. Many programs offer services to drug injectors that include risk reduction training, facilitated entry into substance abuse treatment, and medical care.
SEPs can reduce the transmission of syringe-borne viruses without increasing illicit drug use. However, lack of resources, acceptance, and consequently, protection of many of those at risk when they are most vulnerable have hampered program effectiveness. New studies need to be designed to explicate the full measure of program benefit within covered communities and identify the means by which SEPs can expand benefit to individuals at greatest risk.
本章试图描述影响注射器传播病毒的因素,根据这些因素回顾注射器交换项目(SEP)的效果,并探讨SEP促进健康活动的范围。
本章分为六个部分:注射器传播病毒的生物学因素、行为与病毒传播、病毒传播的量化、预防病毒传播、预防病毒传播的障碍以及预防病毒传播的研究。了解生物学和行为因素如何影响人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和肝炎的传播,为调查SEP的流行病学及其对疾病传播的影响建立了一个框架。即使在这些项目似乎无效的情况下,理解生物学和行为因素的影响也有助于我们理解项目的益处和局限性。此外,项目的益处可能不限于对疾病传播的直接影响。许多项目为药物注射者提供服务,包括降低风险培训、促进进入药物滥用治疗以及医疗护理。
SEP可以减少注射器传播病毒的传播,而不会增加非法药物的使用。然而,资源匮乏、接受度低,因此,许多高危人群在最脆弱的时候得不到保护,这阻碍了项目的有效性。需要设计新的研究来阐明覆盖社区内项目益处的全面衡量标准,并确定SEP能够将益处扩大到风险最大个体的方法。