• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合研究与实践的差距:探索从业者和管理者的研究文化。

Bridging the research-practice gap: exploring the research cultures of practitioners and managers.

作者信息

Le May A, Mulhall A, Alexander C

机构信息

Brunel University, Isleworth, England.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):428-37. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00634.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00634.x
PMID:9725742
Abstract

To ensure effective utilization of research in nursing more evidence is needed which illuminates the way nurses think about research, the value which they put on it, and how they envisage that it may help or hinder them in their everyday work. This English study aimed to meet these objectives by describing the research culture of practising nurses, health visitors and midwives, and their managers. It rests on two assumptions. Firstly that the reasons why practitioners do, or do not, base their practice on research are complex, and secondly, that interventions to increase research utilization must be grounded in an appreciation of this complex 'whole'. Thus the study took a qualitative approach to exploring: what participants thought and felt about research; the current status of research based practice; and the opportunities and constraints to increasing research based practice. The results confirm the hypothesis that many factors, both individual and organizational affect research utilization. Furthermore, practitioners and managers hold differing perceptions regarding the nature of research, its role, and the opportunities and constraints which effect its dissemination and utilization. The implications of the results for education, policy and practice are discussed.

摘要

为确保护理研究得到有效利用,需要更多证据来阐明护士对研究的思考方式、他们对研究的重视程度,以及他们设想研究在日常工作中可能如何帮助或阻碍他们。这项英国研究旨在通过描述执业护士、健康访视员、助产士及其管理人员的研究文化来实现这些目标。它基于两个假设。首先,从业者基于或不基于研究开展实践的原因很复杂;其次,提高研究利用率的干预措施必须基于对这个复杂“整体”的理解。因此,该研究采用定性方法来探索:参与者对研究的想法和感受;基于研究的实践的现状;以及增加基于研究的实践的机会和限制。结果证实了这一假设,即许多个人和组织因素都会影响研究的利用。此外,从业者和管理人员对研究的性质、其作用以及影响其传播和利用的机会和限制持有不同的看法。文中还讨论了研究结果对教育、政策和实践的影响。

相似文献

1
Bridging the research-practice gap: exploring the research cultures of practitioners and managers.弥合研究与实践的差距:探索从业者和管理者的研究文化。
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):428-37. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00634.x.
2
Managerial leadership for nurses' use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature.护士运用研究证据的管理领导力:文献综合综述
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):126-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00095.x.
3
Nurses' experiences of research utilization within the framework of an educational programme.护士在教育项目框架内的研究应用经验。
J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):671-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00526.x.
4
Examining the knowledge, attitude and use of research by nurses.考察护士对研究的知识、态度及应用情况。
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Apr;16(3):334-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00808.x.
5
Clinical nurse educators as agents for change: increasing research utilization.临床护士教育者作为变革推动者:提高研究成果利用率
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Nov;42(8):899-914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.11.006.
6
The role of nursing administrators in empowering scholarly productivity among clinicians.护理管理者在提高临床医生学术产出方面的作用。
Semin Nurse Manag. 1999 Dec;7(4):179-82.
7
An exploration of the influence of managerial factors on research utilization in district nursing practice.
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Apr;23(4):697-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00040.x.
8
Turn theory into reality.将理论转化为现实。
Nurs Manage. 2007 Aug;38(8):12, 14. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000286183.68314.a0.
9
Predictors of nurses' perceptions of barriers to research utilization.护士对研究应用障碍认知的预测因素
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Apr;16(3):305-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00770.x.
10
Joined up thinking.综合思维
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2005 Nov;12(7):10-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes of primary healthcare chief physicians towards research in Finland - a national study.初级保健首席医师对芬兰研究的态度-一项全国性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Jun;41(2):140-151. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2196537. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Midwives' views on the acceptability of a future trial of the Sims posture for fetal malposition in labor in the context of their knowledge and practice: A mixed-methods study.在了解和实践背景下,助产士对未来关于分娩时胎儿胎位异常采用西姆斯体位试验可接受性的看法:一项混合方法研究
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Aug 1;6:50. doi: 10.18332/ejm/150377. eCollection 2022.
3
The University of Limerick Education and Research Network for General Practice (ULEARN-GP): practice characteristics and general practitioner perspectives.
利默里克大学全科医学教育和研究网络(ULEARN-GP):实践特征和全科医生视角。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 5;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1100-y.
4
The Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: Meta-analysis.加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表的可靠性:荟萃分析。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,准确的可能是“Acuity Scale”即“急症严重程度量表” ,完整准确译文应为:加拿大分诊与急症严重程度量表的可靠性:荟萃分析。 )
N Am J Med Sci. 2015 Jul;7(7):299-305. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.161243.
5
The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis.澳大利亚分诊量表的可靠性:一项荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(2):94-9. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002.
6
Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index: Meta-analysis.急诊严重程度指数的可靠性:荟萃分析。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015 Feb;15(1):e71-7. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Examining and addressing evidence-practice gaps in cancer care: a systematic review.检查和解决癌症护理中的证据-实践差距:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2014 Mar 25;9(1):37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-37.
8
Guidelines for establishing a telemental health program to provide evidence-based therapy for trauma-exposed children and families.建立远程心理健康项目以向受创伤儿童及其家庭提供循证治疗的指南。
Psychol Serv. 2014 Nov;11(4):398-409. doi: 10.1037/a0034963. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey.基层医疗保健中的研究活动与能力:REACH研究:一项调查
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 May 11;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-33.
10
Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care.循证指南还是集体构建的“思维脉络”?基层医疗中知识管理的人种志研究。
BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1013. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1013.