Broadhurst N A, Bond M J
School of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.
J Spinal Disord. 1998 Aug;11(4):341-5.
A double-blind trial was carried out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of three commonly used pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. The trial involved 40 patients, all of whom reported pain when they were subjected to each of the three tests. Half of the patients (20) had the symptomatic sacroiliac joint injected with 4 ml of 1% lignocaine, whereas the other 20 patients received 4 ml of normal saline to the painful joint. The level of pain produced by each of the three tests was assessed pre- and posttest injection using a visual analogue scale of 0-100. If the pain could be suppressed by 70% with injection of either normal saline or 1% lignocaine into the symptomatic sacroiliac joint under image intensification, the test was considered to be positive for pain arising from the sacroiliac joint. None of the patients receiving normal saline had their pain suppressed to any significant degree, whereas those patients receiving 1% lignocaine had their pain suppressed sufficiently for the three pain provocation tests to have a specificity of 100% for each test and a sensitivity range of 77-87%. This study indicates that the three tests, when used in combination, have a high predictive value for pain arising from the sacroiliac joint.
开展了一项双盲试验,以确定三种常用的疼痛激发试验对骶髂关节功能障碍的敏感性和特异性。该试验涉及40名患者,所有患者在接受这三种试验中的每一种时均报告有疼痛。一半患者(20名)在有症状的骶髂关节注射4毫升1%利多卡因,而另外20名患者在疼痛关节注射4毫升生理盐水。使用0至100的视觉模拟量表在注射前后评估三种试验各自产生的疼痛程度。如果在影像增强下向有症状的骶髂关节注射生理盐水或1%利多卡因可使疼痛减轻70%,则该试验被认为对骶髂关节引起的疼痛呈阳性。接受生理盐水注射的患者中,无一例疼痛得到显著减轻,而接受1%利多卡因注射的患者,其疼痛得到充分减轻,三种疼痛激发试验的特异性均为100%,敏感性范围为77%至87%。这项研究表明,这三种试验联合使用时,对骶髂关节引起的疼痛具有较高的预测价值。