• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视力、听力及其他障碍老年工人的职业伤害:一项验证性研究

Occupational injuries among older workers with visual, auditory, and other impairments. A validation study.

作者信息

Zwerling C, Whitten P S, Davis C S, Sprince N L

机构信息

University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center, Iowa City 52242, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Aug;40(8):720-3. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199808000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00043764-199808000-00010
PMID:9729756
Abstract

This study aims to validate a previously defined model of the risk of occupational injuries among older workers with visual, auditory, or other impairments. That model was based upon the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). The previous logistic regression model was recalculated using data from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The parameter estimates for impaired hearing (.181 in NHIS, 1.55 in HRS), impaired vision (2.42 in NHIS, 1.48 in HRS), and self-employment (0.22 in NHIS, 0.49 in HRS) were in same direction and of roughly the same magnitude. The previously defined model was confirmed using NHIS data. The data suggest that as the workforce ages, more attention must be paid to the accommodation of disabilities in the workplace, especially sensory impairments-poor vision and hearing.

摘要

本研究旨在验证先前定义的老年视力、听力或其他功能障碍工人职业伤害风险模型。该模型基于健康与退休研究(HRS)。使用1994年国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的数据重新计算了先前的逻辑回归模型。听力受损(NHIS中为0.181,HRS中为1.55)、视力受损(NHIS中为2.42,HRS中为1.48)和自营职业(NHIS中为0.22,HRS中为0.49)的参数估计值方向相同且幅度大致相同。使用NHIS数据证实了先前定义的模型。数据表明,随着劳动力老龄化,必须更加关注工作场所的残疾适应问题,尤其是视力和听力等感官障碍。

相似文献

1
Occupational injuries among older workers with visual, auditory, and other impairments. A validation study.视力、听力及其他障碍老年工人的职业伤害:一项验证性研究
J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Aug;40(8):720-3. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199808000-00010.
2
Occupational injuries among workers with disabilities: the National Health Interview Survey, 1985-1994.
JAMA. 1997;278(24):2163-6.
3
Occupational injuries among older workers with disabilities: a prospective cohort study of the Health and Retirement Survey, 1992 to 1994.残疾老年工人的职业伤害:1992年至1994年健康与退休调查的前瞻性队列研究
Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1691-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1691.
4
Risk factors for occupational injuries among older workers: an analysis of the health and retirement study.老年工人职业伤害的风险因素:健康与退休研究分析
Am J Public Health. 1996 Sep;86(9):1306-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.9.1306.
5
User needs evaluation of workplace accommodations.用户需要对工作场所便利设施进行评估。
Work. 2006;27(4):355-62.
6
Associations of demographic and injury-related factors with return to work among job-injured workers with disabilities in South Korea.韩国残疾工伤工人中,人口统计学和与伤害相关的因素与重返工作岗位之间的关联。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 May;44(5):473-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0907.
7
Workplace accommodations for people with disabilities: National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement, 1994-1995.为残疾人士提供的工作场所便利措施:1994 - 1995年国家健康访谈调查残疾补充调查
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 May;45(5):517-25. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000063623.37065.b4.
8
Self-Reported Visual Disability and Unemployment: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey.自我报告的视力障碍与失业:来自国家健康访谈调查的结果。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;31(5):488-490. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2024.2310841. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
9
Characteristics of nonfatal occupational injuries among U.S. workers with and without disabilities.美国残疾和非残疾工人非致命职业伤害的特征。
Am J Ind Med. 2015 Feb;58(2):168-77. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22395.
10
[Visual, hearing, and motor impairments in the indigenous population in Brazil].[巴西原住民的视觉、听力和运动障碍]
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Oct 11;34(10):e00131717. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00131717.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Functional Comorbidity Index with administrative workers' compensation data: Utility, validity, and caveats.使用功能共病指数分析行政工人赔偿数据:效用、有效性和注意事项。
Am J Ind Med. 2024 Feb;67(2):99-109. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23550. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
2
United States Population Disparities in Ophthalmic Care: Blindness and Visual Impairment in the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).美国眼科护理中的人口差异:IRIS® 注册研究中的失明和视力损害(智能视觉研究)。
Ophthalmology. 2023 Nov;130(11):1121-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Differential underestimation of work-related reinjury risk for older workers: Challenges to producing accurate rate estimates.
老年工人职业性再损伤风险的低估差异:产生准确比率估计的挑战。
Am J Ind Med. 2022 Aug;65(8):627-643. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23403. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
4
Workplace Organizational and Psychosocial Factors Associated with Return-to-Work Interruption and Reinjury Among Workers with Permanent Impairment.与永久性损伤工人的工作中断和再损伤相关的工作场所组织和心理社会因素。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 Jun 12;65(5):566-580. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa133.
5
Estimating time to reinjury among Washington State injured workers by degree of permanent impairment: Using state wage data to adjust for time at risk.利用州工资数据调整风险时间,估算华盛顿州受伤工人因永久损伤程度而再次受伤的时间。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Jan;64(1):13-25. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23200. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
6
Relating Older Workers' Injuries to the Mismatch Between Physical Ability and Job Demands.将老年工人的工伤与身体能力和工作要求之间的不匹配联系起来。
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Feb;59(2):212-221. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000941.
7
Nonoccupational and occupational injuries to US workers with disabilities.美国残疾工人的非职业性和职业性伤害。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Sep;102(9):e38-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300888. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Chronic health problems and risk of accidental injury in the workplace: a systematic literature review.慢性健康问题与工作场所意外伤害风险:一项系统文献综述
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Nov;65(11):757-64. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037440. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
9
Obesity in US workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 1986 to 2002.美国劳动者的肥胖问题:1986年至2002年全国健康访谈调查
Am J Public Health. 2005 Sep;95(9):1614-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.050112. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
10
Are we blind to injuries in the visually impaired? A review of the literature.我们对视力受损者的损伤视而不见吗?文献综述。
Inj Prev. 2002 Jun;8(2):155-60. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.2.155.