Manley M T, Capello W N, D'Antonio J A, Edidin A A, Geesink R G
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Aug;80(8):1175-85. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00011.
We evaluated 377 patients (428 hips) who had been managed, by a total of fourteen surgeons at twelve clinical sites in the United States and Europe, with a porous-coated press-fit acetabular cup, a hydroxyapatite-coated threaded screw-in cup, or one of two similar designs of hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups between April 1987 and November 1992. The same type of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem was inserted without cement in all patients. After a minimum duration of follow-up of five years (mean, 7.9 years; range, 5.3 to 9.1 years), one (1 per cent) of the 131 hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups, two (2 per cent) of the 109 porous-coated press-fit cups, and twenty-one (11 per cent) of the 188 hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups had been revised because of aseptic loosening. A common radiographic sign of impending failure of the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups was radiolucency at the interface between the implant and the subchondral bone beneath it. This radiolucency usually was seen initially more than two years after implantation. Radiographic evaluation of the 383 acetabular implants that were in situ at the time of the most recent follow-up showed that 123 (99 per cent) of the 124 hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups, 101 (98 per cent) of the 103 porous-coated cups, and 139 (89 per cent) of the 156 hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups were stable with osseous ingrowth (as indicated by the absence of radiolucency at the interface and the absence of migration within the acetabulum). The probability of revision due to aseptic loosening was significantly greater for the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups than it was for the hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups or the porous-coated press-fit cups (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Within the group of patients who had a hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cup, the probability of revision due to aseptic loosening was significantly greater in association with a young age (p = 0.003), female gender (p = 0.02), the use of a femoral head with a diameter of thirty-two millimeters (p = 0.018), and the use of a thin polyethylene liner (p < 0.001). We found that the hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups and the porous-coated press-fit cups continued to perform well more than five years after the operation. The hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups that were revised probably failed because the fixation interface beneath the cup could not sustain the tensile stresses that were imposed between the cup and the bone by the activity of the patient. Our data suggest that, in the specific biomechanical environment of the acetabulum, physical interlocking between the cup and the supporting bone beneath it may be a prerequisite for long-term stability.
我们评估了377例患者(428髋),这些患者于1987年4月至1992年11月期间在美国和欧洲的12个临床地点由总共14位外科医生使用多孔涂层压配髋臼杯、羟基磷灰石涂层螺纹拧入杯或两种类似设计的羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯之一进行治疗。所有患者均未使用骨水泥植入同类型的羟基磷灰石涂层股骨柄。在至少随访5年(平均7.9年;范围5.3至9.1年)后,131个羟基磷灰石涂层螺纹杯中有1个(1%)、109个多孔涂层压配杯中2个(2%)以及188个羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯中有21个(11%)因无菌性松动而进行了翻修。羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯即将失败的一个常见影像学表现是植入物与其下方软骨下骨之间的界面出现透光线。这种透光线通常在植入后最初两年以上出现。在最近一次随访时对383个在位髋臼植入物进行的影像学评估显示,124个羟基磷灰石涂层螺纹杯中有123个(99%)、103个多孔涂层杯中101个(98%)以及156个羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯中有139个(89%)通过骨长入保持稳定(表现为界面无透光线且髋臼内无移位)。羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯因无菌性松动而翻修的概率显著高于羟基磷灰石涂层螺纹杯或多孔涂层压配杯(两项比较p均<0.001)。在使用羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯的患者组中,因无菌性松动而翻修的概率在年轻患者(p = 0.003)、女性(p = 0.02)、使用直径32毫米的股骨头(p = 0.018)以及使用薄聚乙烯内衬的情况下显著更高(p < 0.001)。我们发现羟基磷灰石涂层螺纹杯和多孔涂层压配杯在手术后5年以上仍表现良好。进行翻修的羟基磷灰石涂层压配杯可能失败是因为杯下方的固定界面无法承受患者活动在杯与骨之间施加的拉应力。我们的数据表明,在髋臼的特定生物力学环境中,杯与其下方支撑骨之间的物理嵌合可能是长期稳定的前提条件。