Suppr超能文献

比较肽段碰撞诱导解离光谱的方法:文库搜索和减法分析的潜力

Method to compare collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides: potential for library searching and subtractive analysis.

作者信息

Yates J R, Morgan S F, Gatlin C L, Griffin P R, Eng J K

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7730, USA.

出版信息

Anal Chem. 1998 Sep 1;70(17):3557-65. doi: 10.1021/ac980122y.

Abstract

We report the development of a method to compare collision-induced dissociation (CID) spectra of peptides. This method employs a cross-correlation analysis of a CID spectrum to a reference spectrum and normalizes the cross-correlation score to the autocorrelation of the CID spectra. The query spectrum is compared by using both mass information and fragmentation patterns. Fragmentation patterns are compared to each other using a correlation function. To evaluate the specificity of the approach, a set of 2180 tandem mass spectra obtained from both triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometers (TSQ) and quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometers (LCQ) was created. Comparisons are performed between tandem mass spectra obtained on the same instrument type as well as between different instrument types. Accurate and reliable comparisons are demonstrated in both types of analyses. The scores obtained in the cross-comparison of TSQ and LCQ tandem mass spectra of the same peptide are found to be slightly lower than comparisons performed with spectra obtained on the same instrument type. The method appears insensitive to variations in day-to-day performance of the instrument, minor variations in fragment ion abundance, and instrumental differences inherent in the same instrument model. The use of this method of comparison is demonstrated for library searching and subtractive analysis of tandem mass spectra obtained during LC/MS/MS experiments.

摘要

我们报告了一种比较肽段碰撞诱导解离(CID)谱的方法的开发情况。该方法采用CID谱与参考谱的互相关分析,并将互相关分数归一化为CID谱的自相关。通过使用质量信息和碎裂模式来比较查询谱。使用相关函数相互比较碎裂模式。为了评估该方法的特异性,创建了一组从三重四极杆串联质谱仪(TSQ)和四极杆离子阱质谱仪(LCQ)获得的2180个串联质谱。在相同仪器类型获得的串联质谱之间以及不同仪器类型之间进行比较。在这两种类型的分析中都证明了准确可靠的比较。发现相同肽段的TSQ和LCQ串联质谱交叉比较中获得的分数略低于使用相同仪器类型获得的谱进行的比较。该方法似乎对仪器日常性能的变化、碎片离子丰度的微小变化以及同一仪器型号固有的仪器差异不敏感。展示了该比较方法在液相色谱/串联质谱(LC/MS/MS)实验中获得的串联质谱库搜索和减法分析中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验