St Peter W L, Lewis M J, Macres M G
Division of Nephrology, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Sep;32(3):470-4. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9740164.
Subcutaneous (s.c.) injection is an approved route of administration for recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa). However, pain at the injection site with the single-dose formulation has limited its use. With the recent development of a multidose formulation containing benzyl alcohol as a preservative, anecdotal reports have emerged that suggest this product causes less stinging. Using a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design, this study compared pain perception, intensity, and duration after s.c. injection with a multidose formulation versus single-dose formulation using visual analogue (VAS) and verbal descriptive pain scales (VDS). Twenty-eight hemodialysis patients received s.c. injections of placebo (normal saline) in one arm and either the multidose or single-dose formulation in the opposite arm. One week later, the subjects again received placebo in one arm and the other epoetin alfa formulation in the opposite arm. The VAS and VDS measurements were obtained at time 0 and then every 5 minutes for a period of 30 minutes. Results showed a statistically significant difference in pain perception between formulations at times 0, 10, and 15 minutes for both the VAS and VDS. In conclusion, there was a significant difference in pain perception between formulations with the multidose formulation causing less pain than the single-dose formulation. However, it should be noted that several patients reported no pain with the single-dose formulation. This indicates that individual patient response could be considered when deciding which formulation to use, although it may be difficult to implement an error-free distribution and administration system using the two different formulations.
皮下注射是重组人促红细胞生成素(阿法依泊汀)的一种批准给药途径。然而,单剂量制剂注射部位疼痛限制了其应用。随着近期含苯甲醇作为防腐剂的多剂量制剂的研发,有传闻称该产品引起的刺痛较少。本研究采用随机、三盲、安慰剂对照交叉设计,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和语言描述性疼痛量表(VDS),比较了多剂量制剂与单剂量制剂皮下注射后的疼痛感知、强度和持续时间。28名血液透析患者在一侧手臂皮下注射安慰剂(生理盐水),在对侧手臂皮下注射多剂量制剂或单剂量制剂。一周后,受试者再次在一侧手臂接受安慰剂注射,在对侧手臂接受另一种阿法依泊汀制剂注射。在0时刻以及之后的30分钟内每5分钟进行一次VAS和VDS测量。结果显示,在0、10和15分钟时,VAS和VDS测量结果均表明两种制剂之间的疼痛感知存在统计学显著差异。总之,两种制剂之间的疼痛感知存在显著差异,多剂量制剂引起的疼痛少于单剂量制剂。然而,应注意的是,有几名患者报告单剂量制剂无疼痛。这表明在决定使用哪种制剂时可考虑个体患者的反应,尽管使用两种不同制剂实施无差错的分发和给药系统可能存在困难。