Wilke A, Kruse T, Hesse H, Funck R, Maisch B
Department of Internal Medicine, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Sep;21(9):1784-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00279.x.
Electromagnetic fields arising from a variety of different sources have been shown to interfere with normal pacemaker function. This study evaluated the possible interactions between two modern security systems and different pacemaker types. Fifty-three patients (27 single chamber pacemakers, 25 dual chamber pacemakers) have been tested routinely for their pacemaker function. Thirty-eight patients presented with unipolar sensing and 15 with bipolar sensing. The patients were asked to walk through an installed security system, an antitheft device, and electromagnetic access device with different field strengths while a six-channel ECG monitored the patients. The pacemaker systems were first measured in their basic programmed modes, then the intervention frequency was changed to 100/min and, thereafter, the maximum sensitivity without T wave oversensing was added. In the security system with the highest field strength (2,700 mA/m), a pacemaker malfunction could be observed in 13% of the monitored patients. In one case, a pacemaker (VVIR) switched to ventricular safety pacing (VOO mode). In the security system with the lower field strength (1,600 mA/m) we found a pacemaker malfunction in 4% of the tested patients. In the antitheft device (50 mA/m), in the electromagnetic access device (300 mA/m), and in pacemaker systems with bipolar sensing, none of these dysfunctions were observed. Phantom programming as described previously did not occur in any of the systems. Persons who are often in the vicinity of security systems should be equipped with a bipolar pacemaker system. Our findings indicate that patients with pacemakers should avoid contact with security systems.
已证明,来自各种不同来源的电磁场会干扰正常的起搏器功能。本研究评估了两种现代安全系统与不同类型起搏器之间可能存在的相互作用。对53例患者(27例单腔起搏器、25例双腔起搏器)的起搏器功能进行了常规测试。38例患者采用单极感知,15例采用双极感知。在六通道心电图监测患者的同时,要求患者走过安装有不同场强的安全系统、防盗装置和电磁门禁装置。首先在基本程控模式下测量起搏器系统,然后将干预频率改为100次/分钟,此后增加无T波过感知的最大灵敏度。在场强最高(2700 mA/m)的安全系统中,13%的受监测患者出现起搏器故障。有1例起搏器(VVIR)切换到心室安全起搏(VOO模式)。在场强较低(1600 mA/m)的安全系统中,发现4%的受试患者出现起搏器故障。在防盗装置(50 mA/m)、电磁门禁装置(300 mA/m)以及采用双极感知的起搏器系统中,均未观察到这些功能障碍。在任何系统中均未出现之前描述的虚拟程控情况。经常处于安全系统附近的人员应配备双极起搏器系统。我们的研究结果表明,植入起搏器的患者应避免接触安全系统。