Suppr超能文献

微创手术:一家地区医院的经验

Minimal invasive surgery: a district hospital experience.

作者信息

Hamour O A, Kashgari R H, al-Harbi M A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Commission Medical Centre, Yanbu Industrial City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

East Afr Med J. 1998 May;75(5):274-8.

PMID:9746997
Abstract

This was a prospective analysis of the first 162 patients who underwent biliary and nonbiliary minimally invasive (video laparoscopic) procedures in the Royal Commission Medical Centre (RCMC) over two periods separated by a one year interval (September 1993-September 1994)-(October 1995-February 1996). One hundred and fifty patients had video laparoscopic cholecystectomy (VLC). Thirty four males and 116 females with a mean age of 39.7 years (range 16-80). Forty two patients (28%) were admitted as emergency (37 acute cholecystitis, 5 acute pancreatitis). The indication for VLC was symptomatic gall stones. The VLC was accomplished successfully in 144 patients (96%). Six patients (2 electives and 4 emergency) required a conversion for various reasons, unfavourable anatomy being the commonest. Ten patients with preoperative evidence of a dilated common bile duct, with or without stones had an ERCP done in another hospital 200 km away. The median operative time was 100 minutes (range 30-270 minutes) There were three major complications (one CBD injury, one bleeding from gall bladder bed and one post operative acute pancreatitis) and 6 minor complications (urethral bleeding, atelectasis post-operative pyrexia, umbilical port cellulitis, prolonged ileus and acute anxiety state). The median hospital stay was 72 hours for successful VLC. Twenty five per cent of the patients did not require any narcotic analgesic. Twelve patients (7.4%) had one or another non-biliary video laparoscopic procedure. Our results suggest that VLC can be offered and performed safely in the majority of patients presenting with acute and/or chronic cholecystitis and that the results we achieved in a district hospital are comparable to other series. We conclude that VLC will continue to be demanded by patients and non-biliary video laparoscopic procedures which were slow to develop in our hospital will continue to need special training, interest and expertise before it can be adopted as a routine.

摘要

这是一项前瞻性分析,研究对象为皇家委员会医疗中心(RCMC)在两个时间段内接受胆道和非胆道微创(视频腹腔镜)手术的首批162例患者,两个时间段间隔一年(1993年9月 - 1994年9月) - (1995年10月 - 1996年2月)。150例患者接受了视频腹腔镜胆囊切除术(VLC)。其中男性34例,女性116例,平均年龄39.7岁(范围16 - 80岁)。42例患者(28%)为急诊入院(37例急性胆囊炎,5例急性胰腺炎)。VLC的适应证为有症状的胆结石。144例患者(96%)成功完成了VLC。6例患者(2例择期手术和4例急诊手术)因各种原因需要中转开腹,最常见的原因是解剖结构不佳。10例术前有胆总管扩张证据(无论有无结石)的患者,在200公里外的另一家医院进行了内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。中位手术时间为100分钟(范围30 - 270分钟)。有3例主要并发症(1例胆总管损伤、1例胆囊床出血和1例术后急性胰腺炎)和6例 minor并发症(尿道出血、肺不张、术后发热、脐部切口蜂窝织炎、肠梗阻延长和急性焦虑状态)。成功进行VLC的患者中位住院时间为72小时。25%的患者不需要任何麻醉性镇痛药。12例患者(7.4%)接受了一项或多项非胆道视频腹腔镜手术。我们的结果表明,大多数急性和/或慢性胆囊炎患者可以安全地接受VLC,并且我们在一家地区医院所取得的结果与其他系列相当。我们得出结论,患者将继续需要VLC,而在我们医院发展缓慢的非胆道视频腹腔镜手术,在被采用为常规手术之前,将继续需要特殊培训、兴趣和专业知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验