• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌手术后的输血时机与术后感染性并发症:对179例连续患者的回顾性研究

Transfusion timing and postoperative septic complications after gastric cancer surgery: a retrospective study of 179 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Bellantone R, Sitges-Serra A, Bossola M, Doglietto G B, Malerba M, Franch G, Pacelli F, Crucitti F

机构信息

Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1998 Sep;133(9):988-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.988.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.133.9.988
PMID:9749853
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression associated with homologous blood transfusion was first observed in renal allograft transplantation. Clinical effects of transfusion-induced immunosuppression in surgical patients have been debated in the literature for more than a decade with contradictory results.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether homologous blood transfusions significantly affect postoperative septic morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective surgery for gastric cancer.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Hospitalized care.

PATIENTS

The hospital records of 209 patients who underwent elective surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery of the Hospital del Mar, Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain, and at the Department of Surgery of the Catholic University of Rome in Italy from April 1984 to December 1990 were reviewed, and 179 patients were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The following variables were entered into univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors potentially affecting postoperative septic morbidity: demographic data, weight loss, preoperative serum albumin level and lymphocyte count, type and duration of operative procedure, amount and timing of blood transfusion, and stage of disease.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that a large quantity of blood transfused (> 1500 mL) and transfusion in the postoperative period (group C) were associated with a worse clinical outcome. Postoperative transfusion was an independent predictor of septic morbidity in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite transfusion-induced immunomodulation, homologous blood transfusion should not be considered a risk factor for postoperative septic morbidity in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. The timing-response relationship between transfusions and septic morbidity in multivariate analysis may be the effect of uncontrolled confounders such as variation of volemia induced by stress response in patients who were developing or had just developed infectious complications.

摘要

背景

与同种异体输血相关的免疫抑制最早在肾移植中被观察到。输血诱导的免疫抑制对手术患者的临床影响在文献中已争论了十多年,结果相互矛盾。

目的

探讨同种异体输血是否会显著影响择期胃癌手术患者术后的感染发病率和死亡率。

设计

病例系列研究。

地点

住院治疗。

患者

回顾了1984年4月至1990年12月在西班牙巴塞罗那自治大学德尔马医院外科和意大利罗马天主教大学外科接受择期胃癌手术的209例患者的医院记录,179例患者纳入研究。

主要观察指标

将以下变量纳入单因素和多因素分析,以确定可能影响术后感染发病率的因素:人口统计学数据、体重减轻、术前血清白蛋白水平和淋巴细胞计数、手术类型和持续时间、输血量和输血时间以及疾病分期。

结果

单因素分析显示,大量输血(>1500 mL)和术后输血(C组)与较差的临床结局相关。在多因素分析中,术后输血是感染发病率的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管输血可诱导免疫调节,但对于接受择期腹部大手术的患者,不应将同种异体输血视为术后感染发病率的危险因素。多因素分析中输血与感染发病率之间的时间反应关系可能是由未控制的混杂因素所致,如正在发生或刚发生感染并发症的患者因应激反应引起的血容量变化。

相似文献

1
Transfusion timing and postoperative septic complications after gastric cancer surgery: a retrospective study of 179 consecutive patients.胃癌手术后的输血时机与术后感染性并发症:对179例连续患者的回顾性研究
Arch Surg. 1998 Sep;133(9):988-92. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.9.988.
2
[Association of perioperative transfusion and postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[胃癌根治性胃切除术后围手术期输血与术后并发症的关联]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Mar 18;94(10):751-4.
3
Is malnutrition still a risk factor of postoperative complications in gastric cancer surgery?营养不良仍是胃癌手术术后并发症的危险因素吗?
Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;27(3):398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
4
Impact of peri-operative blood transfusion on post-operative infections after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis focusing on the timing, amount of transfusion and role of leukocyte depletion.围手术期输血对胃癌根治术后术后感染的影响:倾向评分匹配分析,重点关注输血时机、输血量和白细胞去除的作用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;144(6):1143-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2630-8. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Blood transfusion and infection after colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术后的输血与感染
Transfusion. 1996 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):1000-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36111297091746.x.
6
Blood transfusions and results after curative resection for gastric cancer.胃癌根治性切除术后的输血情况及结果
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S27-30.
7
Peri-operative blood transfusion increases length of hospital stay and number of postoperative complications in non-cardiac surgical patients.围手术期输血会增加非心脏手术患者的住院时间和术后并发症的数量。
Hong Kong Med J. 2010 Apr;16(2):116-20.
8
Relationship of transfusion and infectious complications after gastric carcinoma operations.胃癌手术后输血与感染性并发症的关系。
Transfusion. 1991 Feb;31(2):114-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31291142940.x.
9
Are allogeneic blood transfusions associated with decreased survival after surgical treatment for spinal metastases?异体输血与脊柱转移瘤手术治疗后的生存率降低有关吗?
Spine J. 2016 Aug;16(8):951-61. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.03.043. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
Blood Transfusion in Major Abdominal Surgery for Malignant Tumors: A Trend Analysis Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.腹部恶性肿瘤大手术中的输血:基于国家手术质量改进计划的趋势分析。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 1;151(6):518-25. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5094.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of peri-operative blood transfusion on post-operative infections after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis focusing on the timing, amount of transfusion and role of leukocyte depletion.围手术期输血对胃癌根治术后术后感染的影响:倾向评分匹配分析,重点关注输血时机、输血量和白细胞去除的作用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;144(6):1143-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2630-8. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
2
Perioperative Allogenenic Blood Transfusion is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcome for Patients Undergoing Gastric Carcinoma Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.围手术期异体输血与胃癌手术患者更差的临床结局相关:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1574. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001574.
3
Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on clinical outcomes in hepatic surgery for cancer.围手术期输血对肝癌肝切除术临床结局的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug 28;15(32):3976-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3976.
4
Risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy.接受全胃切除术的胃癌患者手术并发症及死亡率的危险因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov 14;14(42):6560-3. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6560.
5
Incidence and risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia after surgery for gastric cancer: results of prospective surveillance.胃癌手术后医院获得性肺炎的发病率及危险因素:前瞻性监测结果
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1045-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9534-8.
6
Effect of perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion on the immune-inflammatory response after colorectal cancer resection.围手术期异体红细胞输注对结直肠癌切除术后免疫炎症反应的影响。
World J Surg. 2007 Oct;31(10):2044-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9159-3.
7
Postoperative infections after oesophageal resections: the role of blood transfusions.食管切除术后的感染:输血的作用。
World J Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov 21;4:80. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-4-80.
8
Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.输血对结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后围手术期及长期预后的影响。
Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):381. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000152989.76942.6b.
9
Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.输血对结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后围手术期及长期预后的影响。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):860-9; discussion 869-70. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072371.95588.DA.
10
A tailored perioperative blood transfusion might avoid undue recurrences in gastric carcinoma patients.个体化的围手术期输血可能避免胃癌患者不必要的复发。
Dig Dis Sci. 2000 Sep;45(9):1737-42. doi: 10.1023/a:1005538429420.