• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Maternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery.

作者信息

Amu O, Rajendran S, Bolaji I I

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):463-5.

PMID:9758469
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Maternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery.
BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):463-5.
2
Elective caesarean section on request. All types of anaesthesia carry risks.应要求进行选择性剖宫产。所有类型的麻醉都有风险。
BMJ. 1999 Jan 9;318(7176):120.
3
Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent.非选择性剖宫产中医生与患者的冲突：发生率及知情同意的充分性
Am J Perinatol. 1996 Apr;13(3):171-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994319.
4
Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.患者选择剖宫产：伦理问题。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;20(2):116-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f55df7.
5
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.应产妇要求剖宫产：有限资源的明智利用？来自一线的观点。
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):305-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.012.
6
Elective caesarean delivery at maternal request: a preliminary study of motivations influencing women's decision-making.应产妇要求进行的选择性剖宫产：影响女性决策动机的初步研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Aug;48(4):415-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00867.x.
7
Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries.应要求剖宫产：八个欧洲国家产科医生态度的比较
BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):647-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00933.x.
8
[Maternal request--what impact does it have on the Cesarean section rate?].[产妇要求——它对剖宫产率有何影响？]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Jan 17;167(3):279-81.
9
Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians.阴道分娩与选择性剖宫产的比较：孕妇和临床医生的观点
BJOG. 2008 Nov;115(12):1494-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01892.x. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
10
The ethical debate of maternal choice and autonomy in cesarean delivery.剖宫产中产妇选择与自主权的伦理辩论。
Clin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;35(2):455-62, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and Management of Uterine Rupture in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Series and Literature Review.妊娠晚期子宫破裂的诊断与处理：病例系列及文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 2;15(6):e39861. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39861. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Exploring the impact of indication on variation in rates of intrapartum caesarean section in six Palestinian hospitals: a prospective cohort study.探讨 6 家巴勒斯坦医院中，产时剖宫产率差异的影响因素：一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05196-8.
3
Assessing the Factors Affecting Cesarean Section Selection in Iranian Women Using Multilevel Count Models with Excess Zeros.
使用含过多零值的多层计数模型评估影响伊朗女性剖宫产选择的因素。
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Apr;50(4):816-824. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i4.6008.
4
Maternal request caesareans and COVID-19: the virus does not diminish the importance of choice in childbirth.产妇要求剖宫产与 COVID-19：病毒并未降低分娩选择的重要性。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Nov;46(11):726-731. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106526. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Factors that influenced pregnant women with one previous caesarean section regarding their mode of delivery.影响有一次剖宫产史的孕妇分娩方式的因素。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 18;55:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.007. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Cesarean delivery to prevent anal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术预防肛门失禁：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Sep;23(9):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02029-3. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.为什么选择性剖宫产“抽签”在伦理上是不允许的。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):249-268. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0.
8
Defensive caesarean section: A reality and a recommended health care improvement for Romanian obstetrics.预防性剖宫产：罗马尼亚产科的现实与推荐的医疗保健改进。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):111-116. doi: 10.1111/jep.13025. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Comparing two instructional methods of role playing and lecture on primigravida females, decision about type of delivery.比较针对初产妇关于分娩方式决策的角色扮演和讲座这两种教学方法。
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 May 5;6:29. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_85_15. eCollection 2017.
10
Factors leading to cesarean section delivery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective record review.埃塞俄比亚西北部费莱盖希沃特转诊医院剖宫产分娩的相关因素：一项回顾性记录 review（此处原文review有误，可能是review study之类，暂按“回顾性记录审查”翻译）
Reprod Health. 2016 Jan 20;13:6. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0114-8.