• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于较小家庭单位的确诊校正。

Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units.

作者信息

Bonney G E

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Oct;63(4):1202-15. doi: 10.1086/302057.

DOI:10.1086/302057
PMID:9758615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1377489/
Abstract

Ascertainment concerns the manner by which families are selected for genetic analysis and how to correct for it in likelihood models. Because such families are often neither drawn at random nor selected according to well-defined rules, the problem of ascertainment correction in the genetic analysis of family data has proved durable. This paper undertakes a systematic study of ascertainment corrections in terms of smaller distinct units, which will usually be sibships, nuclear families, or small pedigrees. Three principal results are presented. The first is that ascertainment corrections in likelihood models for family data can be made in terms of smaller units, without breaking up the pedigree. The second is that the appropriate correction for single ascertainment in a unit is the reciprocal of the sum of the marginal probabilities of all the persons relevant to its ascertainment, as if affected. The third result is a generalization of the single ascertainment-correction formula to k-plex ascertainment, in which each unit has k or more affecteds. The correction is the reciprocal of the sum of the joint probabilities of all distinct sets of k persons in the unit, as if they were all affected. In extended families, two additional ascertainment schemes will be considered and explicit formulas will be presented. One of these schemes is "uniform-proband-status ascertainment," in which nonmembers of a given unit have the same chance as members to become probands if they are affected; the other scheme is the "inverse law of ascertainment," in which the chance that nonmembers of a unit will become probands for that unit decreases with degree of relationship. Several specific recommendations are made for further study.

摘要

确定涉及选择用于基因分析的家庭的方式以及如何在似然模型中对其进行校正。由于此类家庭通常既不是随机抽取的,也不是根据明确的规则选择的,因此在家庭数据的基因分析中,确定校正问题一直存在。本文对以较小的不同单位(通常是同胞组、核心家庭或小系谱)进行的确定校正进行了系统研究。给出了三个主要结果。第一个结果是,家庭数据似然模型中的确定校正可以根据较小的单位进行,而无需拆分系谱。第二个结果是,对单位中单次确定的适当校正是与确定相关的所有人员(假设为受影响者)的边际概率之和的倒数。第三个结果是将单次确定校正公式推广到k重确定,其中每个单位有k个或更多受影响者。校正是该单位中所有不同的k人集合的联合概率之和的倒数,就好像他们都受影响一样。在大家庭中,将考虑另外两种确定方案并给出明确的公式。其中一种方案是“均匀先证者状态确定”,在这种方案中,如果给定单位的非成员受影响,他们成为先证者的机会与成员相同;另一种方案是“反向确定定律”,在这种方案中,单位非成员成为该单位先证者的机会随着亲属关系程度的增加而降低。针对进一步研究提出了一些具体建议。

相似文献

1
Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units.基于较小家庭单位的确诊校正。
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Oct;63(4):1202-15. doi: 10.1086/302057.
2
Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework.系谱数据确定问题的内在难处理性:一个通用似然框架。
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):33-43.
3
Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.校正使用患病同胞对连锁数据获得的相对风险估计值的确定偏倚。
Genet Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;18(4):307-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(200004)18:4<307::AID-GEPI4>3.0.CO;2-3.
4
Sampling schemes and ascertainment.抽样方案与确定方法。
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1979;32:363-82.
5
Comparison of ascertainment-bias correction schemes for pedigrees ascertained through multiple probands.通过多个先证者确定的家系的确诊偏倚校正方案比较。
Stat Med. 1985 Apr-Jun;4(2):163-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040207.
6
Correcting for Ascertainment.校正确诊情况。
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1666:211-232. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_11.
7
A two-stage approach to the correction of ascertainment bias in complex genetic studies involving variance components.一种用于校正涉及方差成分的复杂基因研究中确定偏倚的两阶段方法。
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;71(Pt 2):220-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00307.x.
8
A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait.人类遗传学中的一个双变量问题:通过相关性状确定家系。
Am J Med Genet. 1984 Jul;18(3):435-48. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320180313.
9
Sampling correction in linkage analysis.连锁分析中的抽样校正
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;27(2):87-96. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20008.
10
The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis.先证者指定对分离分析的影响。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Sep;39(3):329-39.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistical approaches for meta-analysis of genetic mutation prevalence.遗传突变患病率的荟萃分析的统计方法。
Genet Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;45(2):154-170. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22364. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Analysis of familial aggregation studies with complex ascertainment schemes.采用复杂确定方案的家族聚集性研究分析
Stat Med. 2008 Oct 30;27(24):5076-92. doi: 10.1002/sim.3327.
3
Classification of Missense Mutations of Disease Genes.疾病基因错义突变的分类
J Am Stat Assoc. 2005;100(469):51-60. doi: 10.1198/016214504000001817.
4
Ascertainment adjustment in genetic studies of ordinal traits.有序性状基因研究中的确定度调整。
Hum Genet. 2006 May;119(4):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0147-8. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
5
Genes, age, and alcoholism: analysis of GAW14 data.基因、年龄与酗酒:GAW14 数据分析
BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S119.
6
Complex segregation analysis reveals a multigene model for lung cancer.复杂分离分析揭示了肺癌的多基因模型。
Hum Genet. 2005 Jan;116(1-2):121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1212-9. Epub 2004 Nov 16.