Tanaka T, Gotay C C
John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, USA.
Acad Med. 1998 Sep;73(9):1003-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809000-00022.
To compare medical students' and oncologists' perspectives about patient-related quality of life (QOL).
In 1996, the authors compared the questionnaire responses of 65 oncologists and 105 medical students in the state of Hawai'i.
Participants returned 146 usable questionnaires (response rates: 69% of oncologists and 97% of students). Both groups saw pain and suffering as central to QOL, while medical students also valued autonomy. Both groups indicated that QOL was at least as important as survival in treatment decision making. Students were significantly more likely to emphasize the importance of QOL over survival. Students strongly preferred physician interviews to assess QOL. Most physicians reported assessing QOL in every patient, but only one in ten had used a QOL assessment questionnaire.
Both students and oncologists expressed considerable interest in QOL and virtually all regarded it as an important part of care. There were more similarities than differences in responses. Future educational programs in both medical school and continuing education should build on these positive attitudes.
比较医学生和肿瘤学家对患者相关生活质量(QOL)的看法。
1996年,作者比较了夏威夷州65名肿瘤学家和105名医学生的问卷回复情况。
参与者共返回了146份可用问卷(回复率:肿瘤学家为69%,学生为97%)。两组都认为疼痛和痛苦是生活质量的核心,而医学生也重视自主性。两组都表示,在治疗决策中,生活质量至少与生存同样重要。学生明显更倾向于强调生活质量比生存更重要。学生强烈倾向于由医生进行访谈来评估生活质量。大多数医生报告称会对每位患者进行生活质量评估,但只有十分之一的医生使用过生活质量评估问卷。
学生和肿瘤学家都对生活质量表现出了浓厚兴趣,几乎所有人都认为它是护理的重要组成部分。回复中相似之处多于差异。医学院和继续教育未来的教育项目应基于这些积极态度开展。