Suppr超能文献

比较患者和医生对糖尿病相关生活质量的评估。

Comparing assessment of diabetes-related quality of life between patients and their physicians.

机构信息

The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.

D-Cure Foundation, Petach-Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Nov 19;16(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1040-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (QoL) is a comprehensive, multidimensional construct encompassing physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Physicians frequently assess QoL as part of their decision making process without specifically asking their patients. This study examined the degree and predictors of concordance between physician and patient assessments of QoL among patients with diabetes in primary care and in multi-disciplinary diabetes clinics.

METHODS

Patients completed a questionnaire regarding overall and diabetes-specific QoL before entering their physician's office. After the visit, the physician completed the same questionnaire in order to evaluate how he/she perceived that patient's QoL. In addition, medical data relating to the patient's health status were collected from the medical records. The concordance between patient-reported QoL and physician-estimated QoL was evaluated. Stepwise regression analysis was conducted to determine which factors contributed to the difference between physicians' and patients' assessment of QoL.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients and 39 treating physicians were surveyed. Patients' response rate was 95%. A strong concordance was found between patients' and physicians' ratings of current health status (r = 0.79, p < 0. 01); however, physicians perceived their patients' QoL as worse than the QoL assessed by the patients themselves. Primary care physicians were better at assessing their patients' overall wellbeing while diabetes-specialists were better at assessing their patients' diabetes-specific QoL. In addition, the longer the duration of diabetes, the more difficult is was for the physicians to accurately assess QoL. When entered in the regression analysis, familiarity did not explain physicians' ability to assess health-related QoL or diabetes-specific QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians make reasonable assessments of their patients' QoL, however as the patients' disease progresses, it becomes harder for physicians to assess QoL. Primary care physicians are better at assessing overall well-being whereas diabetes specialists are better at assessing diabetes-specific QoL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not registered. Assuta Medical Center institutional review board approval number 2009103.

摘要

背景

健康相关生活质量(QoL)是一个全面的、多维的结构,包含身体和社会心理健康。医生在做出决策时经常评估 QoL,而无需特别询问患者。本研究考察了初级保健和多学科糖尿病诊所中糖尿病患者的医生和患者对 QoL 的评估之间的一致性程度和预测因素。

方法

患者在进入医生办公室之前完成了一份关于整体和糖尿病特定 QoL 的问卷。就诊后,医生填写了相同的问卷,以评估他/她对该患者 QoL 的看法。此外,从病历中收集了与患者健康状况相关的医疗数据。评估了患者报告的 QoL 与医生估计的 QoL 之间的一致性。进行逐步回归分析,以确定哪些因素导致医生和患者对 QoL 的评估存在差异。

结果

共调查了 136 名患者和 39 名治疗医生。患者的回复率为 95%。患者和医生对当前健康状况的评分之间存在很强的一致性(r=0.79,p<0.01);然而,医生认为他们患者的 QoL 比患者自己评估的 QoL 更差。初级保健医生更擅长评估患者的整体健康状况,而糖尿病专家更擅长评估患者的糖尿病特定 QoL。此外,糖尿病的病程越长,医生就越难以准确评估 QoL。当纳入回归分析时,熟悉程度并不能解释医生评估健康相关 QoL 或糖尿病特定 QoL 的能力。

结论

医生对患者的 QoL 做出了合理的评估,然而随着患者病情的发展,医生评估 QoL 变得更加困难。初级保健医生更擅长评估整体健康状况,而糖尿病专家更擅长评估糖尿病特定 QoL。

试验注册号

未注册。Assuta 医疗中心机构审查委员会批准号 2009103。

相似文献

3
Physicians' Perception of Sickle-cell Disease Pain.医生对镰状细胞病疼痛的认知。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2016 May;108(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验