Chan T C, Vilke G M, Neuman T
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Diego Medical Center, 92103, USA.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1998 Sep;19(3):201-5. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199809000-00001.
The use of the hogtie restraint (also known as hobble or prone maximal restraint) by law enforcement and prehospital personnel has come under scrutiny because of reports of sudden deaths in persons placed in this restraint position. Some contend that this body position restricts chest and abdominal movement to the point that individuals are at risk for hypoventilatory respiratory compromise and "positional" asphyxiation. We review case reports of custody deaths in subjects placed in the hogtie position, as well as related medical literature regarding positional asphyxia. We also review the current research findings from human physiology studies that have investigated the effects of the hogtie position on respiratory and pulmonary function. We conclude that the hogtie restraint position by itself does not cause respiratory compromise to the point of asphyxiation and that other factors are responsible for the sudden deaths of individuals placed in this position.
由于有报告称处于这种约束姿势的人突然死亡,执法人员和院前急救人员使用捆绑式约束(也称为捆绑或俯卧位最大约束)受到了审查。一些人认为,这种身体姿势会限制胸部和腹部的运动,以至于个体有通气不足导致呼吸功能受损和“体位性”窒息的风险。我们回顾了处于捆绑姿势的被拘留者死亡的病例报告,以及关于体位性窒息的相关医学文献。我们还回顾了人体生理学研究的当前研究结果,这些研究调查了捆绑姿势对呼吸和肺功能的影响。我们得出结论,捆绑式约束姿势本身不会导致呼吸功能受损至窒息程度,其他因素才是导致处于这种姿势的个体突然死亡的原因。