Division of Cardiology, Community Memorial Hospital, Ventura, CA, USA.
Med Sci Law. 2021 Jul;61(3):215-226. doi: 10.1177/0025802420988370. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Deaths occurring among agitated or violent individuals subjected to physical restraint have been attributed to positional asphyxia. Restraint in the prone position has been shown to alter respiratory and cardiac physiology, although this is thought not to be to the degree that would cause asphyxia in a healthy, adult individual. This comprehensive review identifies and summarizes the current scientific literature on prone position and restraint, including experiments that assess physiology on individuals restrained in a prone position. Some of these experimental approaches have attempted to replicate situations in which prone restraint would be used. Overall, most findings revealed that individuals subjected to physical prone restraint experienced a decrease in ventilation and/or cardiac output (CO) in prone restraint. Metabolic acidosis is noted with increased physical activity, in restraint-associated cardiac arrest and simulated encounters. A decrease in ventilation and CO can significantly worsen acidosis and hemodynamics. Given these findings, deaths associated with prone physical restraint are not the direct result of asphyxia but are due to cardiac arrest secondary to metabolic acidosis compounded by inadequate ventilation and reduced CO. As such, the cause of death in these circumstances would be more aptly referred to as "prone restraint cardiac arrest" as opposed to "restraint asphyxia" or "positional asphyxia."
因身体约束而出现躁动或暴力行为的个体死亡归因于位置性窒息。虽然俯卧位会改变呼吸和心脏生理功能,但据认为,这不会导致健康成年人窒息。本综述确定并总结了关于俯卧位和约束的当前科学文献,包括评估俯卧位约束个体生理的实验。其中一些实验方法试图复制俯卧位约束可能会遇到的情况。总的来说,大多数研究结果表明,在俯卧位中接受身体约束的个体在俯卧位约束中经历了通气和/或心输出量(CO)的下降。代谢性酸中毒伴随着活动增加,与约束相关的心脏骤停和模拟遭遇有关。通气和 CO 的减少会显著加重酸中毒和血液动力学。鉴于这些发现,与俯式身体约束相关的死亡并不是窒息的直接结果,而是由于代谢性酸中毒导致的心脏骤停,同时伴有通气不足和 CO 降低。因此,在这些情况下,死亡原因更恰当地称为“俯卧位约束性心脏骤停”,而不是“约束性窒息”或“位置性窒息”。