• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effectiveness of voice therapy for patients with non-organic dysphonia.

作者信息

Carding P N, Horsley I A, Docherty G J

机构信息

Department of Speech and Voice Therapy, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998 Aug;23(4):310-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00147.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00147.x
PMID:9762492
Abstract

Forty-five patients diagnosed as having non-organic dysphonia were assigned in rotation to one of three groups. Patients in one group received no treatment and acted as a control group. Patients in the other two groups received a programme of either 'indirect' therapy or 'direct with indirect' therapy, respectively. A self-report questionnaire of vocal performance, observed ratings of voice quality, and computer-derived acoustic measurements (signal-to-noise ratio, pitch perturbation and amplitude perturbation) were carried out on all patients before and after treatment to evaluate the changes in voice quality over time. There was a significant difference between the three groups on the self-report questionnaire, voice quality ratings and pitch perturbation measurements (P = < 0.05). Thirteen out of 15 control patients showed no significant change on any of the measures. Seven patients who received indirect treatment showed significant improvement in voice quality following treatment. Fourteen out of 15 patients who received direct treatment showed significant improvement in voice quality.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of voice therapy for patients with non-organic dysphonia.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998 Aug;23(4):310-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00147.x.
2
A study of the effectiveness of voice therapy in the treatment of 45 patients with nonorganic dysphonia.
J Voice. 1999 Mar;13(1):72-104. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80063-0.
3
Dysphonia: medical treatment and a medical voice hygiene advice approach. A prospective randomised pilot study.发音障碍:医学治疗与医学嗓音卫生建议方法。一项前瞻性随机试点研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Jul;261(6):312-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0641-8. Epub 2003 Oct 14.
4
Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial.嗓音治疗对发声障碍有效吗?一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):658-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.658.
5
Interventions for treating functional dysphonia in adults.成人功能性发声障碍的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD006373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006373.pub2.
6
Voice outcome in patients treated for laryngeal cancer: efficacy of voice rehabilitation.喉癌患者的语音结果:语音康复的疗效
J Voice. 2014 Jan;28(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
7
An evaluation study of voice therapy in non-organic dysphonia.
Eur J Disord Commun. 1992;27(2):137-58. doi: 10.3109/13682829209012036.
8
Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.音调强度作为嗓音障碍治疗的一项疗效指标。
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):691-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Voice Quality Following Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Randomized Comparison of Therapeutic Modalities.单侧声带麻痹后的嗓音质量:治疗方式的随机对照比较
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):774.e9-774.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
Comparing voice-therapy and vocal-hygiene treatments in dysphonia using a limited multidimensional evaluation protocol.使用有限的多维度评估方案比较语音治疗和嗓音卫生治疗在发音障碍中的效果。
J Commun Disord. 2011 Nov-Dec;44(6):615-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Voice-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation.与声音相关的患者报告结局指标:仪器开发与验证的系统评价
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):62-88. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0022.
2
Predictors of Six-month Change in the Voice Handicap Index in a Treatment-seeking Population.寻求治疗人群中嗓音障碍指数六个月变化的预测因素
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
3
Predicting and influencing voice therapy adherence using social-cognitive factors and mobile video.
利用社会认知因素和移动视频预测并影响语音治疗依从性
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):164-76. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-12-0123.
4
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for vocal cord nodules.声带小结的手术与非手术干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD001934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001934.pub2.
5
Interventions for preventing voice disorders in adults.预防成人嗓音障碍的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD006372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006372.pub2.