Skaggs W E, McNaughton B L
Arizona Research Laboratories, Division of Neural Systems, Memory and Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA.
J Neurosci. 1998 Oct 15;18(20):8455-66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-20-08455.1998.
Populations of 10-39 CA1 pyramidal cells were recorded from four rats foraging for food reward in an environment consisting of two nearly identical boxes connected by a corridor. For each rat, a higher-than-chance fraction of cells had similarly shaped spatial firing fields in both boxes, but other cells had completely different fields in the two boxes. The level of correlation of fields in the two boxes differed greatly across rats and, for three of the four rats, across recording sessions. Thus, the factors controlling the level of correlation are likely to be subtle. Two control manipulations were performed. First, the two boxes were physically interchanged. In no case did firing fields move along with the boxes. Second, on the final session of recording, the rat was started in the south box, after having been started in the north box for every previous session. For at least two of the four rats, the north fields from the previous session were instantiated in the south during the first visit of the second session, but thereafter reverted. Thus neither differences between the physical boxes nor sensory input from outside the apparatus could account for the differences in firing fields: most likely they were caused by a combination of learned expectations and a neural mechanism for remembering movements. These findings could be explained either by hypothesizing a more sophisticated attractor-map architecture than has been proposed previously, or by hypothesizing that the hippocampus conjunctively encodes both map information and some other type of information.
从四只在由一条走廊连接的两个几乎相同的盒子组成的环境中觅食以获取食物奖励的大鼠身上,记录了10 - 39个CA1锥体细胞的群体活动。对于每只大鼠,高于随机比例的细胞在两个盒子中具有形状相似的空间放电场,但其他细胞在两个盒子中的放电场则完全不同。两个盒子中放电场的相关程度在不同大鼠之间以及四只大鼠中的三只在不同记录时段之间差异很大。因此,控制相关程度的因素可能很微妙。进行了两种对照操作。首先,将两个盒子进行了物理互换。在任何情况下,放电场都没有随着盒子移动。其次,在记录的最后一个时段,大鼠在前几个时段都从北盒开始,而在最后一个时段从南盒开始。对于四只大鼠中的至少两只,在前一个时段的北盒放电场在第二个时段的首次访问期间在南盒中出现,但此后又恢复了。因此,物理盒子之间的差异以及装置外部的感觉输入都不能解释放电场的差异:最有可能的是它们是由学习期望和记忆运动的神经机制共同造成的。这些发现可以通过假设一种比以前提出的更复杂的吸引子地图架构来解释,或者通过假设海马体联合编码地图信息和其他某种类型的信息来解释。