Suppr超能文献

持续循环腹膜透析患者中无菌性腹膜炎的暴发

Outbreak of sterile peritonitis among continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis patients.

作者信息

Mangram A J, Archibald L K, Hupert M, Tokars J I, Silver L C, Brennan P, Arduino M, Peterson S, Parks S, Raymond A, McCullough M, Jones M, Wasserstein A, Kobrin S, Jarvis W R

机构信息

Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 1998 Oct;54(4):1367-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00110.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30,000 patients receive peritoneal dialysis in the United States. In August 1996, several dialysis centers from different states reported sterile peritonitis among CCPD patients using sterile peritoneal dialysis solution (PDS) from a single manufacturer. The manufacturer recalled 53 lots of PDS that had passed established industry guidelines and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved quality control tests [including endotoxin levels <0.5 endotoxin units (EU)/ml], but had pre-sterilization bacterial colony counts >1 cfu/ml.

METHODS

At one outpatient dialysis center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP), we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all CCPD patients treated during July 15 to August 30, 1996. A case-patient was defined as any HUP patient with culture-negative peritoneal fluid with a white blood cell count >100/mm3, cloudy peritoneal fluid, and/or abdominal pain. PDS and tubing were cultured for bacteria and assayed for endotoxin.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 of 28 patients had sterile peritonitis. The only risk factor identified was exposure to > or =1 lot of recalled PDS (14 of 22 vs. 0/6, P = 0.02); the more recalled lots received, the higher the attack rate (P = 0.0001). Five of 47 PDS bags had detectable endotoxin; recalled lots were more likely to have measurable endotoxin than nonrecalled lots (5/19 vs. 0/17, P = 0.05). When case-patients resumed CCPD using PDS from non-recalled lots, no further cases were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that this outbreak was caused by intrinsic PDS contamination with endotoxin. Pre-sterilization colony counts may be an important quality control indicator for CCPD fluids in conjunction with endotoxin levels.

摘要

背景

在美国,约有30000名患者接受腹膜透析治疗。1996年8月,来自不同州的几家透析中心报告称,使用单一制造商生产的无菌腹膜透析液(PDS)的持续不卧床腹膜透析(CCPD)患者出现了无菌性腹膜炎。该制造商召回了53批已通过既定行业指南和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的质量控制测试的PDS(包括内毒素水平<0.5内毒素单位(EU)/毫升),但灭菌前细菌菌落计数>1 cfu/毫升。

方法

在宾夕法尼亚大学医院(HUP)这一门诊透析中心,我们对1996年7月15日至8月30日期间接受治疗的所有CCPD患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。病例患者定义为任何腹膜液培养阴性、白细胞计数>100/mm³、腹膜液浑浊和/或腹痛的HUP患者。对PDS和管路进行细菌培养并检测内毒素。

结果

总体而言,28名患者中有14名发生了无菌性腹膜炎。确定的唯一危险因素是接触≥1批召回的PDS(22名中的14名 vs. 6名中的0名,P = 0.02);接受召回批次越多,发病率越高(P = 0.0001)。47袋PDS中有5袋检测到内毒素;召回批次比未召回批次更有可能检测到可测量的内毒素(19袋中的5袋 vs. 17袋中的0袋,P = 0.05)。当病例患者使用未召回批次的PDS恢复CCPD治疗时,未再报告新病例。

结论

我们的结果表明,此次疫情是由PDS内源性内毒素污染引起的。灭菌前菌落计数可能是CCPD液体与内毒素水平相结合的重要质量控制指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验