Raine A, Meloy J R, Bihrle S, Stoddard J, LaCasse L, Buchsbaum M S
Department of Psychology, Building, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-1061, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 1998 Summer;16(3):319-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199822)16:3<319::aid-bsl311>3.0.co;2-g.
There appear to be no brain imaging studies investigating which brain mechanisms subserve affective, impulsive violence versus planned, predatory violence. It was hypothesized that affectively violent offenders would have lower prefrontal activity, higher subcortical activity, and reduced prefrontal/subcortical ratios relative to controls, while predatory violent offenders would show relatively normal brain functioning. Glucose metabolism was assessed using positron emission tomography in 41 comparisons, 15 predatory murderers, and nine affective murderers in left and right hemisphere prefrontal (medial and lateral) and subcortical (amygdala, midbrain, hippocampus, and thalamus) regions. Affective murderers relative to comparisons had lower left and right prefrontal functioning, higher right hemisphere subcortical functioning, and lower right hemisphere prefrontal/subcortical ratios. In contrast, predatory murderers had prefrontal functioning that was more equivalent to comparisons, while also having excessively high right subcortical activity. Results support the hypothesis that emotional, unplanned impulsive murderers are less able to regulate and control aggressive impulses generated from subcortical structures due to deficient prefrontal regulation. It is hypothesized that excessive subcortical activity predisposes to aggressive behaviour, but that while predatory murderers have sufficiently good prefrontal functioning to regulate these aggressive impulses, the affective murderers lack such prefrontal control over emotion regulation.
似乎尚无脑部成像研究来探究哪些脑机制支持情感性、冲动性暴力行为与有计划的掠夺性暴力行为。研究假设,与对照组相比,情感性暴力罪犯的前额叶活动较低、皮层下活动较高,前额叶/皮层下比率降低;而掠夺性暴力罪犯的脑功能则相对正常。通过正电子发射断层扫描对41例受试者、15名掠夺性杀人犯和9名情感性杀人犯的左右半球前额叶(内侧和外侧)及皮层下(杏仁核、中脑、海马体和丘脑)区域的葡萄糖代谢进行了评估。与对照组相比,情感性杀人犯的左右前额叶功能较低,右半球皮层下功能较高,右半球前额叶/皮层下比率较低。相比之下,掠夺性杀人犯的前额叶功能与对照组更为接近,但右半球皮层下活动也过高。研究结果支持了这一假设,即情绪性、无计划的冲动杀人犯由于前额叶调节不足,较难调节和控制皮层下结构产生的攻击冲动。研究假设,皮层下活动过度易引发攻击行为,但掠夺性杀人犯具有足够良好的前额叶功能来调节这些攻击冲动,而情感性杀人犯则缺乏这种对情绪调节的前额叶控制。