Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病痴呆某些神经心理学标志物的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of some neuropsychological markers of Alzheimer dementia.

作者信息

Gainotti G, Marra C, Villa G, Parlato V, Chiarotti F

机构信息

Servizio di Neuropsicologia, Istituto di Neurologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1998 Sep;12(3):152-62. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199809000-00006.

Abstract

A standardized neuropsychological test battery was administered to 167 patients with different forms of mild-to-moderate dementia: probable Alzheimer dementia (AD: n = 49), multi-infarct dementia (n = 43), idiopathic Parkinson disease with dementia (n = 35), depressive pseudodementia (n = 26), and progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 14). Results obtained were used (a) to analyze the profiles of cognitive impairment shown by the different dementia groups; (b) to assess the incidence of some neuropsychological patterns that we hypothesized to be more characteristic of AD, in the various groups; and hence (c) to evaluate the reliability of these patterns as diagnostic markers of AD. Four of the patterns investigated were derived from a verbal learning task (Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning test): (1) absence of the primacy effect; (2) tendency to produce intrusion errors during free recall of a word list; (3) absolute decay of memory trace; and (4) tendency to produce false alarms during delayed recognition of the same word list. Two additional patterns were derived from visual-spatial tasks (copying drawings and Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices): (5) occurrence of the closing-in phenomenon in copying drawings; and (6) tendency to choose globalistic or odd responses in Raven's matrices. Though all the six patterns were somewhat useful for identifying AD patients, no pattern met the criteria of being both highly sensitive and highly specific, which should characterize an ideal marker. In fact, intrusions and false alarms were observed in many AD patients, but also in patients affected by other forms of dementia. The absence of the primacy effect, the closing-in phenomenon, and the absolute decay of memory trace were more specific, but could be observed in only one-third of AD patients. We also computed the number of positive patterns shown by each patient and assumed the presence of two or more patterns as a global index suggestive of a dementia of the Alzheimer type. With this cumulative method, a higher level of sensitivity and specificity was achieved in the identification of AD patients.

摘要

对167名患有不同形式轻至中度痴呆症的患者进行了标准化神经心理测试组:可能的阿尔茨海默病痴呆(AD:n = 49)、多发梗死性痴呆(n = 43)、伴有痴呆的特发性帕金森病(n = 35)、抑郁性假性痴呆(n = 26)和进行性核上性麻痹(n = 14)。所获得的结果用于:(a)分析不同痴呆症组所显示的认知障碍特征;(b)评估我们假设更具AD特征的一些神经心理模式在各个组中的发生率;因此(c)评估这些模式作为AD诊断标志物的可靠性。所研究的四种模式源自言语学习任务(雷伊听觉言语学习测试):(1)无首因效应;(2)在自由回忆单词列表时产生侵入性错误的倾向;(3)记忆痕迹的绝对衰退;(4)在延迟识别同一单词列表时产生误报的倾向。另外两种模式源自视觉空间任务(临摹图画和瑞文彩色渐进矩阵):(5)临摹图画时出现向心性现象;(6)在瑞文矩阵中选择整体或奇怪反应的倾向。尽管所有这六种模式在识别AD患者方面都有一定作用,但没有一种模式符合既是高敏感性又是高特异性的标准,而这应该是理想标志物的特征。实际上,在许多AD患者中都观察到侵入性错误和误报,但在患有其他形式痴呆症的患者中也有观察到。无首因效应、向心性现象和记忆痕迹的绝对衰退更具特异性,但仅在三分之一的AD患者中可观察到。我们还计算了每位患者显示的阳性模式数量,并将出现两种或更多模式作为提示阿尔茨海默型痴呆的总体指标。通过这种累积方法,在识别AD患者方面实现了更高水平的敏感性和特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验