• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear?

作者信息

Vigliocco G, Nicol J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(1):B13-29. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00041-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00041-9
PMID:9775519
Abstract

In this paper we address the question whether hierarchical relations and word order can be separated in sentence production. In two experiments, we assess whether subject-verb agreement errors (such as 'The time for fun and games are over') require linear proximity of a so-called 'local' noun ('games' in the example) to the verb. In the first experiment, we found a proximity effect when participants were asked to complete sentential beginnings of the kind: 'The helicopter for the flights'. In the second experiment, we asked participants to produce a question such as 'Is the helicopter for the flights safe?'. The syntactic relation between the subject noun and the local noun is the same in the two experiments, but the linear position of the local noun is different. The distribution of agreement errors was similar in the two experiments. We argue that these data provide evidence for a stage in language production in which a syntactic structure is built prior to a stage in which words are assigned to their linear position. Agreement is computed during the first stage.

摘要

相似文献

1
Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear?
Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(1):B13-29. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00041-9.
2
Agreement and movement: a syntactic analysis of attraction.一致关系与移位:对吸引现象的句法分析
Cognition. 2006 Aug;101(1):173-216. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
Minimal Interference from Possessor Phrases in the Production of Subject-Verb Agreement.在主谓一致的生成过程中,所有格短语的干扰最小。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 2;7:548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00548. eCollection 2016.
4
Subject-verb agreement in children and adults: serial or hierarchical processing?儿童和成人的主谓一致:串行处理还是分层处理?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2005 May;34(3):233-58. doi: 10.1007/s10936-005-3639-0.
5
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
6
Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers.短语韵律限制幼儿的句法分析。
Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Learning a generative syntax from transparent syntactic atoms in the linguistic input.从语言输入中的透明句法原子学习生成性句法。
J Child Lang. 2014 Nov;41(6):1249-75. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000470. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
8
Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.词汇和信息层面的句子语境对阅读注视时间的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jan;20(1):92-103. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.92.
9
Lexico-syntactic constraints influence verbal working memory in sentence-like lists.词汇句法约束影响句子式列表中的言语工作记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1852-1870. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01496-2. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis.学龄前儿童在线使用短语韵律来限制句法分析。
Dev Sci. 2016 Mar;19(2):235-50. doi: 10.1111/desc.12300. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Are feature assignment errors due to attraction? The case of Bulgarian numeral phrase.特征分配错误是由吸引力导致的吗?以保加利亚数字短语为例。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 14;16:1560012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560012. eCollection 2025.
2
Number and Grammatical Gender Attraction in Spanish Pronouns: Evidence for a Syntactic Route to Their Features.西班牙语代词中的数与语法性吸引:其特征句法路径的证据
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.416. eCollection 2025.
3
Number Attraction in Pronoun Production.代词生成中的数字吸引。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Nov 1;8:1247-1290. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00167. eCollection 2024.
4
Neural Networks as Cognitive Models of the Processing of Syntactic Constraints.作为句法约束处理认知模型的神经网络
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 May 6;8:558-614. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00137. eCollection 2024.
5
The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.少数民族语言双语在发现一致吸引错误中的作用:来自意大利语变体的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0298648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298648. eCollection 2024.
6
A Probabilistic and Syntactic Account of Variable Clitic Agreement in Spanish Double Object Constructions.西班牙语双宾结构中可变附着词一致关系的概率与句法阐释
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:815432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815432. eCollection 2022.
7
The Reading Signatures of Agreement Attraction.协议吸引力的阅读特征。
Open Mind (Camb). 2021 Nov 1;5:132-153. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00047. eCollection 2021.
8
An ERP Study on Attraction Effects in Advanced L2 Learners.一项关于高级二语学习者吸引力效应的事件相关电位研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;12:616804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616804. eCollection 2021.
9
Attraction Effects for Verbal Gender and Number Are Similar but Not Identical: Self-Paced Reading Evidence From Modern Standard Arabic.语言性别的吸引效应和数的吸引效应相似但不相同:来自现代标准阿拉伯语的自定步速阅读证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 21;11:586464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586464. eCollection 2020.
10
Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean.临近性和同格标记不会增强理解中的吸引效应:来自韩语眼动追踪实验的证据
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 6;10:1320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01320. eCollection 2019.