Behera D, Sood P, Singh S
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh.
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1998 Apr-Jun;40(2):89-98.
A study was carried out in 200 school children from north India to find out the effects of passive smoking and exposure to domestic cooking fuels on their lung functions. Forced vital capacity and FEV1 were the lowest in boys whose households used biomass fuel (p < 0.05) and PEFR and FEF 25% and 50% were lowest in boys with their homes using kerosene as fuels. All these were the best for LPG fuel. However, in girls there was no significant difference in different parameters, although the values were lower in those using kerosene and biomass fuel. All parameters were lower in passive smokers irrespective of the type of fuel used although they were not statistically significant. However, FEF 50% was significantly less in passive smokers whose households used mixed fuels. The same was true for PEFR, PEFR %, and FEF 25% in cases of LPG fuel use.
在印度北部的200名学童中开展了一项研究,以探究被动吸烟和接触家用烹饪燃料对其肺功能的影响。家庭使用生物质燃料的男孩,其用力肺活量和第一秒用力呼气量最低(p < 0.05);家庭使用煤油作为燃料的男孩,其呼气峰流速以及25%和50%用力呼气流量最低。所有这些指标在使用液化石油气燃料时表现最佳。然而,在女孩中,不同参数之间没有显著差异,尽管使用煤油和生物质燃料的女孩的各项指标值较低。无论使用何种燃料,被动吸烟者的所有参数均较低,尽管差异无统计学意义。然而,家庭使用混合燃料的被动吸烟者,其50%用力呼气流量显著更低。在使用液化石油气燃料的情况下,呼气峰流速、呼气峰流速百分比和25%用力呼气流量也是如此。