• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌食管切除术后组织学浸润切缘的意义

The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Law S, Arcilla C, Chu K M, Wong J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, China.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 Sep;176(3):286-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00140-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00140-8
PMID:9776161
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microscopic tumor infiltration of the resection margin after esophageal resection is implicated to influence anastomotic leakage, tumor recurrence rates, and long-term survival.

METHODS

Patients with tumor infiltration of resection margin (RM+) and those without (RM-) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 604 patients, 45 (7.5%) were RM+. Patients in the RM+ group had more palliative resections, 76% versus 56%, P = 0.01. Anastomotic leakage rates were 2.2% (RM+) and 4.1% (RM-), P = 1.0. Excluding hospital deaths, anastomotic recurrences developed in 10.3% in the RM+ group and 4.9% in the RM- groups, P = 0.15. Although a positive margin did not increase anastomotic recurrence, a shorter resection margin correlated with such recurrence. The mean (SEM) lengths of resection margins in surgical specimens were 2.7 cm (0.3) and 4.4 cm (0.1) for those with and without recurrence, P < 0.001. Median survival time were 8.8 months (RM+) and 15 months (RM-), P = 0.007.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic infiltration of resection margins did not influence leakage rate. Anastomotic recurrence was related to the length of resection margin.

摘要

背景

食管切除术后切缘的微观肿瘤浸润被认为会影响吻合口漏、肿瘤复发率和长期生存率。

方法

对切缘有肿瘤浸润(RM+)和无肿瘤浸润(RM-)的患者进行比较。

结果

在604例患者中,45例(7.5%)为RM+。RM+组患者的姑息性切除更多,分别为76%和56%,P = 0.01。吻合口漏发生率分别为2.2%(RM+)和4.1%(RM-),P = 1.0。排除医院死亡病例后,RM+组吻合口复发率为10.3%,RM-组为4.9%,P = 0.15。虽然切缘阳性并未增加吻合口复发,但切缘较短与这种复发相关。手术标本中切缘的平均(SEM)长度,复发患者和未复发患者分别为2.7 cm(0.3)和4.4 cm(0.1),P < 0.001。中位生存时间分别为8.8个月(RM+)和15个月(RM-),P = 0.007。

结论

切缘的组织学浸润不影响漏出率。吻合口复发与切缘长度有关。

相似文献

1
The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌食管切除术后组织学浸润切缘的意义
Am J Surg. 1998 Sep;176(3):286-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00140-8.
2
Local recurrence after total or subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌全食管或次全食管切除术后的局部复发
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Mar;20(1):17-9.
3
Risk Factors for Local Recurrence and Optimal Length of Esophagectomy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌局部复发的危险因素及食管癌切除术的最佳长度
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1074-80. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.117. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
4
Prognostic significance of a positive radial margin after esophageal cancer resection.食管癌切除术后阳性切缘的预后意义。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):548-55; discussion 555. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.040. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
5
Significance of Microscopically Incomplete Resection Margin After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌食管切除术后显微镜下切缘不完全的意义
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):712-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001325.
6
Do dysplastic proximal resection margins predict the risk of anastomotic recurrence and overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?近端切缘异型增生是否可预测食管鳞癌患者吻合口复发和总体生存率的风险?
Dis Esophagus. 2019 May 1;32(5). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy090.
7
Prognostic Significant or Not? The Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: Impact on Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Patients Without Neoadjuvant Treatment.预后是否具有显著性?食管癌的环周切缘阳性:对未接受新辅助治疗患者局部复发和总生存的影响
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):988-994. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001995.
8
Anastomotic recurrence of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma after transthoracic oesophagectomy.经胸段食管癌切除术后食管鳞状细胞癌的吻合口复发
Eur J Surg. 1998 Oct;164(10):759-64. doi: 10.1080/110241598750005390.
9
What is the optimal distal resection margin for esophageal carcinoma?食管癌的最佳远端切缘是多少?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jan;69(1):205-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01262-x.
10
Local recurrences after subtotal esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma.鳞状细胞癌食管次全切除术后的局部复发
Ann Surg. 1987 Feb;205(2):189-94. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198702000-00014.

引用本文的文献

1
The correlation between the margin of resection and prognosis in esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.食管胃结合部腺癌的切缘与预后的相关性。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct 9;21(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03202-7.
2
Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.局部晚期食管癌环周切缘阳性:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Aug;74(4):1187-1197. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01256-y. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
3
Validation of the use of a fluorescent PARP1 inhibitor for the detection of oral, oropharyngeal and oesophageal epithelial cancers.
验证荧光 PARP1 抑制剂在口腔、口咽和食管上皮癌检测中的应用。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Mar;4(3):272-285. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-0526-9. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Margin-Positive (R1) Esophagectomy: A National Analysis.辅助治疗在切缘阳性(R1)食管癌患者中的作用:一项全国性分析。
J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.11.035. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Surgical principles for optimal treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.食管胃交界腺癌最佳治疗的外科原则
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Jun 11;3(4):390-395. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12268. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
[R1 resection of esophageal carcinoma].食管癌的R1切除
Chirurg. 2017 Sep;88(9):748-755. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0469-1.
7
Unexpected Microscopically Positive Proximal Resection Margins in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Chemoradiotherapy: Predictors and Prognostic Significance.放化疗后食管鳞状细胞癌近端切除边缘意外镜下阳性:预测因素及预后意义
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):191-199. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3734-4.
8
The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on radically resected T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.辅助放疗对根治性切除的T3期食管鳞状细胞癌的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;142(1):277-86. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2041-z. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.肿瘤性食管癌手术中的质量管理与关键绩效指标
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Dec;60(12):3536-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3790-x. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
A study of contractility of proximal surgical margin in esophageal cancer.一项关于食管癌近端手术切缘收缩性的研究。
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2013 Winter;6(1):25-7.